Re: IAB agendas now public

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE451294D0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMzHlj4KGKzG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4907C130DC6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id p12-v6so3998785pfh.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a20ACSzaVKG1/yeP+eyF1XP2ornj17VRKQgpWM3E728=; b=mSk8dduyQcd8jNfTtL9rLlZuHWcE3Li3TF8R5LcW3bHqZwT8x/CwekqKzrOcfZkOPU vDcD2bgtgmo4axRWOWlJVjM4589xlsEVVBglc6dFjfwIdCWlwxBoNfqRv5tq+dv3z3l8 8e6+3fdSY4rG7Ku5eMrR26epWyyWyq3n7dOUKOv7ZcVnbnIbQl6Y1Ah0Y8WZKK252C/R KVMkdJ9fMtHbAVyZ4gsLmGprVUd1Ozm5IMXZc0gTrRv6EcrSMK91kfKwLNkDzvLg4dZf eO7gpuOr73rNgLzXfPEKJI3S2WELpDrubZzkACGLoNhKQ4KgJJUTP0OJhRUnyn8lfm8w Du3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a20ACSzaVKG1/yeP+eyF1XP2ornj17VRKQgpWM3E728=; b=NSlsCk92HK8XOe4kfy6y9ZhXxMeaupfSqdzZLSFqJ1HFRF73l7uaP1dqp8qzcObPbn 98ivYX60GfG2saofBgTvyL3ScPnsDfiNIOBmu/m6gJP5eIZbRk0vIZu6eANbreHb8Alq /ZKVqJIZxyYqx+hh5WMcgQHl4IXdDWFRZcF5cNMOgImUjhSsE1S53vxzQjNWMEfLEmSm 4tm4H+gFXtk3jrK25AowAMYD/4b4vTjVtL8Wc4AG1USgzJtjYW+CJY+NwAdfzdsM/baE jO6BRptK7+BN6YQKJhcedmsTKBQ3GNNIj8876RxehmCNn7SFbIlyKWs230m0mX9TNUuJ ZJUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CtaaAkFmh5rWr4Plg6abiYviSOPw3ZGV+DBo7duqe5+8kgNIyu wmH/7dUHXXxJfhz7LSrMY7gNRN9j
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdawtvdzHSn1hhW7ApcMtUTDC1E9mZuU8GqbTcw/thbF1kQkvyHqt5WgOE/PM9IIJ+eRpJMgkg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:eb53:: with SMTP id b19-v6mr38053268pgk.371.1536176436490; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.96.213] (125-236-219-163.adsl.xtra.co.nz. [125.236.219.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9-v6sm4008403pfb.86.2018.09.05.12.40.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IAB agendas now public
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Cc: IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <b4afddcc-e8dc-9bd8-03d3-6374c29c4749@iab.org> <m2a7ownhl0.wl-randy@psg.com> <BC35696A-D4A6-47EA-A85C-EB472E42596E@lucidvision.com> <CA+9kkMCGNpFQGwEYZzn3CcOAdz_-GGMCP-N4jX_YuJ8tri0Bxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fffabcb8-ee6f-d90b-f661-9011088b892b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:40:30 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCGNpFQGwEYZzn3CcOAdz_-GGMCP-N4jX_YuJ8tri0Bxw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eozXd-KXqPcO8GPPJAEAS_CHWrE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 19:40:39 -0000

On 2018-09-06 02:50, Ted Hardie wrote:
> As you'll note from following the link provided, that is on today's
> agenda.  Thanks for your input into the agenda item.

fwiw I think this is a two-edged sword. It's not a new discussion, of course.
In fact it goes back to 1994 to my personal recollection. And there was
a time when the IAB held open face-to-face meetings at IETF sites, before the
IETF Plenary was invented. When the IAB is discussing architecture, there's
every reason to open the discussion (which is why there are IAB workshops
and architecture-discuss@ietf.org).

But there are quite a lot of issues the IAB has to handle that are not
part of its architecture remit and that do have a political angle. Replay
the great ICANN/IANA saga a couple of years ago, for example. I fear that
either the IAB would have been very inhibited in its discussions, or
they would mainly have been held in executive sessions.

So yes to opening up the discussions, but not all of them.

As for publishing the agenda, yes, we should have done that all along.
Mea culpa.

Regards
    Brian

> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted Hardie
> 
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> All of these meetings should be.
>>
>> —Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:29 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> At the IETF 102 plenary session there was a request to the IAB to make
>>>> its agendas public in advance of its meetings, so that interested
>>>> members of the community could contact the IAB regarding items on the
>>>> agenda.  The IAB agreed, and the draft agendas will be available at:
>>>
>>> my memory is that the critical request that the iab follow the iesg's
>>> lead and make the meeting o-p-e-n.  and i fully and strongly support
>>> that request.
>>>
>>> randy
>>>
>>
>>
>