IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Mon, 19 September 2005 20:36 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHSNH-0001L3-Tv; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHSNG-0001Kd-6N for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA27229 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHSSu-0005Yb-Pv for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:42:19 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2005 13:36:14 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,123,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="343173457:sNHT33383440"
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j8JKZPKm008192; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:03 -0400
Received: from 10.21.89.32 ([10.21.89.32]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:36:03 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:35:58 -0400
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <BF54996E.76D%mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB6BC4179FF930BDC95D4F4A@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2005 20:36:03.0388 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0C62FC0:01C5BD59]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Subject: Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 9/19/05 4:23 PM, "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> I think all areas in the IETF are more-or-less defined as "core of the
> area" + "what is closely linked to the core" + "what fits less badly there
> than elsewhere" - ECRIT would come under "closely linked", since its
> subject area is use of the SIP-type services; GEOPRIV might be more
> characteristic of "fits less badly here than elsewhere" - it is used by
> many of the services like ECRIT, but is also used (or should be) by WGs in
> other areas.

I think there may be a problem here in that "real time" may
suggest to a number of people a level of rigor in timing that's
really not applicable to much of the work the new area is
intended to cover.  I'm enthusiastic about the area;
not so crazy about its name.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email