Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Mon, 19 September 2005 21:07 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHSqx-0001xg-4g; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:07:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EHSqs-0001qR-73 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:07:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29570 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:06:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHSwY-0006O2-B6 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:12:55 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2005 14:06:51 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,123,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="660604122:sNHT834848822"
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j8JL5wKo027180; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:06:44 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp.cisco.com ([10.21.89.61]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:06:43 -0700
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20050919160017.00d492c8@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: jmpolk@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:06:42 -0500
To: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF54996E.76D%mshore@cisco.com>
References: <FB6BC4179FF930BDC95D4F4A@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2005 21:06:43.0725 (UTC) FILETIME=[09B353D0:01C5BD5E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc:
Subject: Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 04:35 PM 9/19/2005 -0400, Melinda Shore wrote:
>On 9/19/05 4:23 PM, "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> > I think all areas in the IETF are more-or-less defined as "core of the
> > area" + "what is closely linked to the core" + "what fits less badly there
> > than elsewhere" - ECRIT would come under "closely linked", since its
> > subject area is use of the SIP-type services; GEOPRIV might be more
> > characteristic of "fits less badly here than elsewhere" - it is used by
> > many of the services like ECRIT, but is also used (or should be) by WGs in
> > other areas.
>
>I think there may be a problem here in that "real time" may
>suggest to a number of people a level of rigor in timing that's
>really not applicable to much of the work the new area is
>intended to cover.  I'm enthusiastic about the area;

I am also enthusiastic about the area

>not so crazy about its name.

I am also concerned about the name. This is basically (not absolutely!) 
about what is in and around SIP, and not everything in SIP is in 
"real-time", with GEOPRIV being one of them. Yet, I believe GEOPRIV should 
be in this new area as there are many of the same faces in the ECRIT, 
GEOPRIV and SIP/SIPPING/SIMPLE WGs. This tells me there is a commonality 
between them such that they ought to be in the same area.

Perhaps something like "Rich Media Apps" Area, shortened to the "Media 
Area" in discussions.


>Melinda
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ietf mailing list
>Ietf@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


cheers,
James

                                 *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf