Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

["Roni Even" <[e-mail]>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2013-8-28

IETF LC End Date: 2013-9-4

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

Minor issues:

I am not clear on the sub-TLV in section 6.2

1.	If a new sub-TLV is defined for TLV type 1 do they need also to be
added to TLV type 21. This should be clear, and if there is some relation I
think it should be reflected in the IANA registry for TLV type 1
2.	For the vendor or private use why a difference policy than the rest
of the sub-TLV registry 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

1.	In section 3.4 I assume that "TC" is traffic class. It will be good
to expand and have reference.