IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sun, 19 January 2020 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D411120033 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:32:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rd3h1xmjcfhi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A83D12001E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id c4so25709267ilo.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:32:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J4c23Akf4gx5lw/x382BqBZTqzrAXOou5e/IZZ+IYgA=; b=LQQK4khUhNFUqLJ7vWU/ljlwtlJUTOs559wjLC5A2gFIXcCJPChDDeZitboCZEyj5H 0DxYKlkBc5BJWfHh7m2rEIgqJTmgd9ANm1hc0E/jekKcpqdAX7LcV4tsJ80UZam09Lbp 1Yc0PzCkXIJ58P/gm/8w6xWUY9vVyL5KS1nO/s9Gqr+cT11MGAT0Vd2EgOHzo7j9jRkQ c/UDAKtMOcZJw8tfHiEAUjavvLK2GbqsFkw8qTesGE1poGuBjNZ9PxF5YcnQ/ft2ROeW 8FJfD/OCH6trHS+Ff4zH6Jyw74Ta3h8KKcHi9HLQEoPzaf+V2QuTh7ufjSFJsKvcNOv1 MYNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J4c23Akf4gx5lw/x382BqBZTqzrAXOou5e/IZZ+IYgA=; b=KdD5bfbu+yiNeyGjsoVUHZStazxGxaBcgBWWYkKER6D1HR3KUzWEOmTevBIp0DgOhU vuvBncKFKtMdMpYptP473lnxrQuVUx/TJ9DTcCycs9jECkOwS62raWy5XQrKtPJYqzqw wE6U4McyWG68H+lQr3d/gko+O/UL/hDJIxafy3sxF1u287jshXXqxI/E2eHgx+QjES0f mHFwxv+wojMD71r7D2FKHEvhK6PlPvjNg+1pYVUIJzwzNjGuNyZ41JIgUqKvlYKKR3si VdWtEdJ8peTlbpHR7IakonNrT6xdlHnu3ogHQ/OYxju6SKRe29bKi7pnDUdEcqqXW3TR SKlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU3QZArssz6nASUErqrOIeE4uonwi78kKCgPnKuGM2E0NYBhaib EkkT6QpPorV+5Z0kXXE58q4DHxJGPZ4h5z2odXY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxF7Legvz6VaH7syxyJic2dPYP2Ljoa7MRtQMqtXfK0Suw+U1li5NMFdLPcQ+/0z38svM7PgRwkOf0bEZclqgo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:498d:: with SMTP id k13mr8020544ilg.254.1579469523403; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:32:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <91b0323b-a2d3-a8e3-0bce-86a53c04fba2@ietf.org> <503dd3a8-8659-7525-3b43-f9c1c5b4e3ae@network-heretics.com> <CABcZeBPp6vMs8erME5QnND+gUh-sa2Qh6vcxqu9WJdG5j4t81Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPp6vMs8erME5QnND+gUh-sa2Qh6vcxqu9WJdG5j4t81Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:31:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy43ov7c=2ytcxHXAdwaxcXTN5XFvvaKGzKzpjzpRE5hw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e04783059c84e76a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LFrWah3Opfr-jNAUgINcLbqhf68>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:32:05 -0000

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:04 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
> I'm not taking a position on whether this subject is "unrelated to
> IETF..." but it seems pretty clear that RFC 3005 was in fact intended to
> allow for discussion to be moved off of the *IETF list*
>

It's true that RFC 3005 intended to move discussion off-list. I wish there
were a better destination than ISOC's odd semi-private list. While it's
important to heed the SAA's warning to move this discussion off of this
list, I refuse to sign up for the ISOC list.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email