IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 31 July 2012 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D9D21F86C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.804, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M9-FzNKG7CK2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ec2-23-21-76-251.compute-1.amazonaws.com (ec2-23-21-76-251.compute-1.amazonaws.com [23.21.76.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABB021F86BE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B0420155; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:41:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 26AF243C6; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:41:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt
References: <20120731005431.21591.33810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJhKW7Nu46MfoFpavTUM311_yDmeczw=14V-KPXLafbcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEEYKD4TEKrv1sg=1wG+YJ=ZLtEOg_nNHx6k=-0C71-KkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:41:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEYKD4TEKrv1sg=1wG+YJ=ZLtEOg_nNHx6k=-0C71-KkA@mail.gmail.com> (Donald Eastlake's message of "Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:18:15 -0400")
Message-ID: <tsllii01d3t.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:42:03 -0000

I'd probably also recommend excluding paid employees of ISOC. I cannot
really think of rationale that applies to the secretariat staff but not
ISOC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email