IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 31 July 2012 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7C221F8679 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zo2Dk-R4CBSo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4347A21F8671 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-6624.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-6624.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.102.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6VGclxW029255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:38:47 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <50180A18.2090008@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:38:48 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt
References: <20120731005431.21591.33810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJhKW7Nu46MfoFpavTUM311_yDmeczw=14V-KPXLafbcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEEYKD4TEKrv1sg=1wG+YJ=ZLtEOg_nNHx6k=-0C71-KkA@mail.gmail.com> <tsllii01d3t.fsf@mit.edu> <m2vch3sy8v.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2vch3sy8v.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:38:54 -0000

On 7/31/12 9:15 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'd probably also recommend excluding paid employees of ISOC. I cannot
>> really think of rationale that applies to the secretariat staff but
>> not ISOC.
> perhaps we should take the leap of assuming folk are adults here (i
> realize it is a stretch), and not start a black-list with no proof of
> termination.
One imagines an ISOC employee participating in the IETF activity on the 
same basis as everyone else who participates in the IETF activity, as 
individuals. if their role is covered by an ex officio office exclusion 
that seems sufficient.
> randy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email