IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Tue, 31 July 2012 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD37621F87ED for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZ6yuwFSbrv7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F69E21F87E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OIHVRCILQ8006AZL@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OIGH28IS2O0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01OIHVR9FZ6E0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:23:11 -0700
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-00.txt
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:15:28 -0700" <m2vch3sy8v.wl%randy@psg.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <20120731005431.21591.33810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJhKW7Nu46MfoFpavTUM311_yDmeczw=14V-KPXLafbcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEEYKD4TEKrv1sg=1wG+YJ=ZLtEOg_nNHx6k=-0C71-KkA@mail.gmail.com> <tsllii01d3t.fsf@mit.edu> <m2vch3sy8v.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:29:37 -0000

> > I'd probably also recommend excluding paid employees of ISOC. I cannot
> > really think of rationale that applies to the secretariat staff but
> > not ISOC.

> perhaps we should take the leap of assuming folk are adults here (i
> realize it is a stretch), and not start a black-list with no proof of
> termination.

+1 on all points, including the stretch part.

				Ned

P.S. I'm not a big fan of "for appearance's sake". All too often it proves to
be a path to madness.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email