IETF Logo Mail Archive

spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)

paul@nohats.ca Fri, 15 April 2016 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783D112E62B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oItSmn0cXGqd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5504B12E668 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qmkbh5gn0zHYQ for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:11:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EuHsuPmEX3T for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:11:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ns0.nohats.ca (ns0.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::102]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:11:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ns0.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id EA8CB4278C; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:11:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns0.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E455841277 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:11:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:11:39 -0400
From: paul@nohats.ca
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1604151309440.27222@ns0.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="===============0871110775886981789=="
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NoMCgEZQsKkdNd6MqVxvZ3UGT8A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:11:58 -0000

Can we have a process where we disallow posting by _everyone_ on the
attendees lists of previous IETF meetings? I think after 4 months there
is no valid reason for allowing to post on those old lists anymore.

Paul

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:15:12
From: bensons@queuefull.net
To: 89attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>,
     Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>,
     Antoin Verschuren <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl>,
     Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>,
     Dave Cottlehuber <dch@skunkwerks.at>
Subject: [89attendees] Fw: new important message

[ spam deleted]
_______________________________________________
89attendees mailing list
89attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email