Re: Doing something wrong

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 11 February 2013 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FE621F8886 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C828l78+ArZO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB03921F884B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1BJ1EkI021569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:15 -0800
Message-ID: <51193FFA.6050008@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:14 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Doing something wrong
References: <CADnDZ883hHwFw2-aPhzx-KaGCzyEuOhjNf1=58DtiBP8rw0Z5g@mail.gmail.com> <201302100346.r1A3k4Ue1561926@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CAKHUCzzhc2O7kO8W1bW0mqb4Noiq+qxEeo_ujmztpLsy+RBriQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130210133122.0a0a1c00@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130210133122.0a0a1c00@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:01:16 -0000

>> And on this note, doing something wrong and being corrected is always
>> a better choice than not doing something.
>
> Agreed.


Well...

That claimed benefit is probably true, from a global perspective, but 
often not true from a local (personal) perspective.

Most of us do local optimization, seeking to avoid criticism. Let's not 
be distracted by the example of the few, cantankerous ones of us who 
appear to be impervious to attack.

What changes this counter-productive pressure to keep quiet is making 
the tone of things be supportive and constructive rather than frankly 
hostile.

Does anyone seriously think the typical IETF exchange displays this 
more-positive tone?

d/

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net