Re: My views on the Scenario O & C
Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Sat, 25 September 2004 21:14 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17900; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:14:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBJzw-0001Tr-J9; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:22:28 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBJoN-0007X5-FC; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:10:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBJne-0007OA-U8 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:09:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17621 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBJuv-0001Oh-7H for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:17:18 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2004 17:26:01 -0400
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from cisco.com (rtp-vpn3-131.cisco.com [10.82.216.131]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id i8PL9B7A018457; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:09:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cisco.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:09:11 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:09:11 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: Erik Huizer <e.huizer@utwente.nl>
Message-ID: <20040925210911.GJ3208@sbrim-w2k01>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, Erik Huizer <e.huizer@utwente.nl>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040924123858.01deecd8@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com> <20040925110025.GZ2280@sbrim-w2k01> <FC591C92FBFA91376029888A@NOBKA051L>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FC591C92FBFA91376029888A@NOBKA051L>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: My views on the Scenario O & C
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 01:57:50PM +0200, Erik Huizer allegedly wrote: > Your remark suggests that ISOC let the IETF down on non-technical > issues that the IETF was expecting to handle. Erik, that was not my intention. What I want to avoid is the feeling that the friendliness of who we deal with, whoever it might be, might allow us to be more relaxed in our handling of non-technical issues. Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- My views on the Scenario O & C Bob Hinden
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Sam Hartman
- ISOC [Re: My views on the Scenario O & C] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Scott W Brim
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Erik Huizer
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Scott W Brim
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Erik Huizer