Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...

Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org> Thu, 27 March 2003 07:26 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA18356; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18yRy7-0008P4-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:38:35 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yRxp-0008NY-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:38:17 -0500
Received: from slimsixten.besserwisser.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA18286 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:22:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.besserwisser.org (mansaxel@localhost.besserwisser.org [127.0.0.1]) by slimsixten.besserwisser.org (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h2R7P5vC027431; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:25:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:25:04 +0100
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
cc: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>, Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...
Message-ID: <222520000.1048749904@localhost.besserwisser.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303270910170.13782-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303270910170.13782-100000@netcore.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (OpenBSD/x86)
X-PGP-KEY: http://vvv.besserwisser.org/key
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========1904702778=========="
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk


--On Thursday, March 27, 2003 09:11:57 +0200 Pekka Savola
<pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:

> You don't get a portable IPv6 address allocation only by being a LIR.
> 
> Except by lying or having an interesting interpretation of the required
> "200 customers" in the application, of course...

That is because the LIR communities haven't changed that yet. I think it
should be changed to what was the intention of a RIPE meeting not long ago;
give all who want some space, as long as they are a LIR. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson    http://vvv.besserwisser.org