Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...

Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 31 March 2003 15:11 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA09691; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:11:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 19013T-00062n-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:18:35 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yvjD-0006ol-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:25:11 -0500
Received: from prue.eim.surrey.ac.uk (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA02060 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:09:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from artemis.ee.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.88.18] ident=eep1lw) by prue.eim.surrey.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #4) id 18yvVK-0004ZJ-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:10:50 +0000
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:10:48 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: eep1lw@artemis.ee.surrey.ac.uk
Reply-To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
cc: alh-ietf@tndh.net, lear@cisco.com, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...
In-Reply-To: <20030327181728.4a62aa94.moore@cs.utk.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0303281505210.10366-100000@artemis.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <3E821485.50006@cisco.com> <048c01c2f3de$182125b0$ee1a4104@eagleswings> <20030327181728.4a62aa94.moore@cs.utk.edu>
Organization: speaking for none
X-url: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/
X-no-archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-133.3 required=5.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_PINE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.50
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Scanner: exiscan *18yvVK-0004ZJ-00*3O.uLee72Lk* (SECM, UniS)
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Keith Moore wrote:

> > What is not
> > fixable is the fact that apps will break if you change an address out
> > from under them.
>
> heck, TCP breaks if you change an address out from under it, so it's
> hardly surprising that apps using TCP break under similar conditions.
> the TCP/IP architecture simply was not designed to tolerate hosts
> changing addresses.  and no, IPv6 doesn't fix this. actually it's very
> difficult to fix at anything above layer 3.

hosts could advertise static loopback addresses. Bind TCP to the
static loopback address.

L.

That identity/location overlap always gets you in the end.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>