Abstract on Page 1?
Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org> Wed, 04 March 2009 15:33 UTC
Return-Path: <mrw@lilacglade.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1C03A6B69 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:33:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yxpt8cMbdA+B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BBE3A679F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NzVt1b0060EZKEL543ZoL2; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:33:48 +0000
Received: from [10.2.0.63] ([69.33.111.74]) by OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P3Zg1b0071cMU3H3M3Zi28; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:33:46 +0000
Message-Id: <2D95D324-D5C4-49DB-B801-90F46FBD0AA2@lilacglade.org>
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Abstract on Page 1?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:33:38 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:33:20 -0000
I would like to propose that we re-format Internet-Drafts such that the boilerplate (status and copyright) is moved to the back of the draft, and the abstract moves up to page 1. I don't believe that there are any legal implications to moving our IPR information to the back of the document, and it would be great not to have to page down at the beginning of every I-D to skip over it. If someone wants to check the licensing details, they could look at the end of the document. Margaret
- Abstract on Page 1? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Stewart Bryant
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Tim Bray
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Melinda Shore
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Julian Reschke
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? ned+ietf
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Paul Hoffman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Rémi Després
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Livingood, Jason
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? TSG
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Doug Ewell
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Paul Hoffman
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? John C Klensin
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Dave CROCKER
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? John C Klensin
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Scott Lawrence
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Julian Reschke
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? David Morris
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Cullen Jennings
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Cullen Jennings
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Tom.Petch
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? SM