Re: Abstract on Page 1?

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 04 March 2009 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A203A6CC5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.283
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.283 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9cC06jdUNaED for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891F63A6CBC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:37:43 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,301,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="35367894"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2009 15:38:10 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n24FcAm9009469; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:38:10 +0100
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24FcA4d003501; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:38:10 GMT
Received: from dhcp-gpk02-vlan300-64-103-65-106.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id n24FcAm00525; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:38:10 GMT
Message-ID: <49AEA062.3090608@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:38:10 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
Subject: Re: Abstract on Page 1?
References: <2D95D324-D5C4-49DB-B801-90F46FBD0AA2@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D95D324-D5C4-49DB-B801-90F46FBD0AA2@lilacglade.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=788; t=1236181090; x=1237045090; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; z=From:=20Stewart=20Bryant=20<stbryant@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Abstract=20on=20Page=201? |Sender:=20; bh=RCyd/plfza9mCd050et/s0CGnOmtE9goQ3NnufwufGQ=; b=tGddg4/pzvjPO7O+2fYhmh3aOF/6CdShRUOpHiZejOxwFdX/uebk9icttA y6j2qYpF+7Z3oT+0E9rEPaCibV+89HA97hD+/ekUqv1St6Rnte/cG7fw4tyN j5TgIrV/zM;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=stbryant@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:37:57 -0000

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>
> I would like to propose that we re-format Internet-Drafts such that 
> the boilerplate (status and copyright) is moved to the back of the 
> draft, and the abstract moves up to page 1.
>
> I don't believe that there are any legal implications to moving our 
> IPR information to the back of the document, and it would be great not 
> to have to page down at the beginning of every I-D to skip over it.  
> If someone wants to check the licensing details, they could look at 
> the end of the document.
>
> Margaret
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
Margaret

Will this break any official  or unofficial ID processing tools?

Stewart