Re: Abstract on Page 1?
Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org> Wed, 04 March 2009 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <mrw@lilacglade.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA573A6A29 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:37:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBXbOj6F5t5F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CADE3A6778 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.12]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P1yn1b0060FhH24A94e1uK; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:38:01 +0000
Received: from [10.2.0.63] ([69.33.111.74]) by OMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P4dp1b00G1cMU3H8U4dsgh; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:37:59 +0000
Message-Id: <46B856D3-A3E1-4E36-A384-C5B3E20E0EE5@lilacglade.org>
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <49AEA062.3090608@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Abstract on Page 1?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:37:47 -0500
References: <2D95D324-D5C4-49DB-B801-90F46FBD0AA2@lilacglade.org> <49AEA062.3090608@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:37:33 -0000
On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Will this break any official or unofficial ID processing tools? Yes, they would need to be updated. But, I think we're due for another round of IPR updates once we resolve the current mess. So, perhaps we could queue this improvement and do it at the same time? Margaret
- Abstract on Page 1? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Stewart Bryant
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Tim Bray
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Melinda Shore
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Julian Reschke
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? ned+ietf
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Paul Hoffman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Rémi Després
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Livingood, Jason
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? TSG
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Doug Ewell
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Paul Hoffman
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? John C Klensin
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Dave CROCKER
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? John C Klensin
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Scott Lawrence
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Julian Reschke
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? David Morris
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Cullen Jennings
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Cullen Jennings
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Abstract on Page 1? Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? Tom.Petch
- Re: Abstract on Page 1? SM