Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Thomas wrote:
| Noel Chiappa wrote:
|>     > From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
|>
|>     > Frankly, it strikes me as somewhat odd that a body acting as a
|>     > standards-setting organization with public impact might allow any
|>     > technical decision on its specifications to be driven by people
|>     > operating under a cloak of anonymity. Expressing an anonymous
|>     > [criticism]? No problem. Influencing determination of a
consensus with
|>     > public impact? That should not be allowed, IMO.
|>
|> Excellent point.
|>
|>
| So I've never met you, Noel. And I certainly don't have any reason to
| believe that this email I'm responding to wasn't forged. How do I know
| that you're not a dog?

You find a third party known to you can vouch for the existence of Noel,
and then you get noel to admit that he sent the message.

|        Mike
| _______________________________________________
| IETF mailing list
| IETF@ietf.org
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH6Tpr8AA1q7Z/VrIRAvk4AJ4g0LqMWGH0YNrAV87SV101XxExWwCeKiDD
rXPg8qEjVBzPtyYK5u6MWTc=
=7Lu5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf