Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 22 March 2008 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAED3A6E1B; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.362, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUZHTsNNqtll; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCAC3A6DFD; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C581F3A6DED for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pnd2-m97GkZV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA02E3A6DE2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 8A6C832F41; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:03:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C17C2123D1; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:02:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:02:54 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
Message-ID: <20080322140254.GA13747@sources.org>
References: <002801c88988$bba6fda0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <004101c88ac1$f57d2600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <5b0cbc7c0803201738s6138a1a4m2fbb546286a9c2ed@mail.gmail.com> <47e4022e.14025a0a.2c46.2519SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <5b0cbc7c0803220222x5b345773oe11dcadc448b7635@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5b0cbc7c0803220222x5b345773oe11dcadc448b7635@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:22:01AM +0100,
 LB <lbleriot@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 96 lines which said:

> what I take for a censure for offence of opinion or nationality. I
> think like somebody else, I use the technical vocabulary appropriate
> for my thought. I think in the same mother tongue as another
> Frenchman.

For the record, since I was one of the three LTRU participants
consulted, and since I'm french, I insist that it has nothing to do
with nationality. People from all over the world, not only USAns,
think the same about the "LB" and "JFC" entities and their dummy
organizations.

It is not a matter of opinion either. To disagree with opinions
require that opinions are expressed. The long and convoluted messages
of LBJFC are "not even wrong" since they are not parsable by an
ordinary engineer. (I can testify it is the same thing when they are
written in french.)

> I would also like to know how locate in your archives the cases
> where the identity of somebody has been challenged within the IETF
> in such manner and what procedures have been initiated.

Randy Presuhn clearly said in his first message that there was no
precedent (and I add that no reasonable person could have believed
that someone was twisted enough to use a sock-puppet.)
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf