RE: How to judge what is the fair site for participation

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Mon, 22 April 2024 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F5DC14F6B7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6sEfvkwQgIr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB5F8C14F6B6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VNGls5z4Qz6K9Gm; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:17:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml500003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.188.49.51]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4260B1400CF; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:17:19 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.250) by mscpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.188.49.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:17:18 +0300
Received: from mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.250]) by mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.250]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:17:18 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Subject: RE: How to judge what is the fair site for participation
Thread-Topic: How to judge what is the fair site for participation
Thread-Index: AQHak3hFkf3dyF2F80e149/a2eOzdbFz4xcA
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:17:18 +0000
Message-ID: <007efa1c61c649c19c8d192226f38fbc@huawei.com>
References: <CAChr6SyBu7xXVeYJe96fMFC1u=jGT6B49awPqVdN72XaqMy_2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SyBu7xXVeYJe96fMFC1u=jGT6B49awPqVdN72XaqMy_2A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.199.56.41]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_007efa1c61c649c19c8d192226f38fbchuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SLR15Gs-7yoxy7RjNNSBmyhQhCQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:17:24 -0000

The opposite direction for many people is the same challenge.
Ed/
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Sayre
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 02:12
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>; Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Subject: Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation

Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org<mailto:benson_muite@emailplus.org>> wrote:

I don't go to these anymore, or even register online. You can just watch them on YouTube and skip the boring parts.

But, if no one went, I would have nothing to watch. So, I agree it's a problem.

For some measurements on things that I have personally flown:

- SFO to Hyderabad: SFO -> Dubai (16 hours), Dubai -> Hyderabad (4 hours)
- SFO to Singapore direct: 17 hours
- JFK to BKK (they don't have this one anymore): 16-17 hours, and the flight went around the world, meaning it flew east to BKK and the return flew east to JFK.

This is probably all slower now, because geopolitical situations can make it difficult to overfly some countries.

These trips are absolutely brutal, even if you fly in business. For a trip like that, it's pretty much a 2-week deal, so you can get your mind back after the jetlag. I think a lot of IETF people actually like planes and things, so it's not a giant pain. The issue is whether one can make the entire time productive. If someone from Australia flies to San Francisco, they can probably book a lot of meetings, even within their own company. Not so going the other way, so that's the issue. It's just a function of the density of Internet companies.

thanks,
Rob