Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation

Shashank Yadav <shashank@asatae.foundation> Wed, 17 April 2024 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shashank@asatae.foundation>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A117C14F60A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=asatae.foundation
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emj1s5tksD-E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sender4-of-o54.zoho.com (sender4-of-o54.zoho.com [136.143.188.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C937DC14F5F5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1713341667; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=bS4S/Pgua+R+Ifx8xT269facwbbdegsZbTWhja+g3bmuHeOqjOBL8NSd8l5AnwgZpUxQv7uFxMOQawvkarEwM778obyEaarUy5Zo1DM33TDniQun5YFei/BBsfG+FjQTNWQkS6aYqJSbLHwUCiSselEdpk6zaWQnKvfWqdMDzEk=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1713341667; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=HgmomB3R5hdREy3QpRT2y/VMoKwNIY9HaML5I/Tw4us=; b=Z3TUERQyAiCgXxolrT4PQ2C9ZR4Gaqw4jRN8Eo3f1/bGueYxUiV1zvymW8YIyaN1Z9v2RvnMNTjn4N2MpkjSL/+9IuF20bOxrSoY2ulMZQkw5ekKNYroWV7KXq+hPLeAaLV06LFkpgf4SG71xJ4ZpilwnJBVWZGRfw3J5/M3r9A=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=asatae.foundation; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shashank@asatae.foundation; dmarc=pass header.from=<shashank@asatae.foundation>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1713341667; s=zoho; d=asatae.foundation; i=shashank@asatae.foundation; h=Date:Date:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Message-Id:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To; bh=HgmomB3R5hdREy3QpRT2y/VMoKwNIY9HaML5I/Tw4us=; b=HxLNdOn+nnBtiuzd9CZbzWXPb7xWPKidJR+BoQfZJvsTIK0QNGqzBYlF72uEy1gm uzYcFLdXkstsX1Ut+BFLYYoZ552NQTeYqDbRsaTSKDNqSCyB6C0BLdDPjxIDt1W2gVE njaAKOadwCzPABQXgVS4fvacRfTW3vErh9XNjxcI=
Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1713341666050533.8503479420093; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:44:26 +0530
From: Shashank Yadav <shashank@asatae.foundation>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <18eeb1f12ea.d2339487693734.4536833868715494865@asatae.foundation>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.39.1713294002.23565.ietf@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.39.1713294002.23565.ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2194333_1937868731.1713341666026"
Importance: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n8bAabJC28kuO5HuBhFO-X7DhT4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:14:39 -0000

>  the ITU has a structure that accommodates voices from many regions, but primarily government and large corporate voices.



The ITU (like the UN) is bogged down by bureaucratic workflows and politics, so there are good reasons for the proliferation of relatively speedier standards organisations. But, what is ostensibly emerging there (unlike the ITU) is a core-periphery distribution of organisational expertise, which can be seen in meeting locations too as pointed out by Anupam and Benson. There is some path dependency here and also a bit of cake distribution. There is no correct solution here - other than online, these activities have to converge at some physical location(s) after all, but as the IETF evolves, an effort certainly has to be made to avoid "core-periphery" designs from becoming a defining organisational characteristic.   





regards, Shashank

https://muskdeer.blogspot.com/