Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 20 April 2024 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDC2C14F6F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNrhV47WKJek for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9585CC14F6AE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a519e1b0e2dso355674166b.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713654725; x=1714259525; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bTmgNFFWkJjACeZePneMaNrnOxVXWCDxFAobWuFIDUM=; b=Y1kRGkO3pQSg5ccBYSr55e7nYWmLKzQNDDG7qp6Fe1A2p0liC3wRvp8iGihw3jBSac pS4C//H7kONjFAdgPWy0FFkgTYhatzSwmigBUIWfNBpfv9m+mnqnzcj9RNbjH5THTzCR WabipnhnuArshW83c5mEl1boa4UQpBIgf2WSjaE5VVax6U/nFEItrGuvn5aKKxx/eKls 5DKzYWhuRM2Lf1wphVBBM2nnoUqx7fZ5SoXc24Nxbtka4k79vF43UHDTtTNZcN8VaSCW RwLI6/mlw5Gwz7NCvdw+M+p5Dq33YCNrwHErcnoWNy/9/x20JsxjLbwEyse9diSG5pZk wzQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713654725; x=1714259525; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bTmgNFFWkJjACeZePneMaNrnOxVXWCDxFAobWuFIDUM=; b=opYnailXE5jHWIiLKU+RFcsR7cKNsVoYxwtqjml8ImzWpLsmZbU+ZZpVwenp8LCci8 AomJWWwEbx34maEfmLvFEvgR6w4m5xMc3zjyuQPAFcV9GPlzQQUiVuAxzA9MaAPseSpf c3AgAuksR9IisDPGRQR+8/VB0j0nL26UloIwOagzF3Zp4DyNnK70Sruva7M3IHaXFa8c VIgbt0+FvfBTpTGXTZ5AZgc6wSfys84eypObL43+e8xMj3Bsyw/LHis1Dz/9rT+wooM4 I1jtcKZecwSkH4Z6YJfOG2QL/4mqm2/9L5BNpc66Lre2eaBoMemRHnUhyuobi3tV99jR GRcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwmPB0F/vQqK3ZgSfprkb1jCnNb599HhrQJXE6eRPTBiCvgr1XW zh2lYc7dmQG6vMKPnoybJ1odN6TnHoLF6PmKQRsO+VnZdwzFDQKlfyJkxI5j+FF4IptJ4h6WPJ8 vsnO3X2VUuDp6pHzRXarqizt3aDcUq2fr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGKJuOeoZi03KjrD2bqcvx6qEF17RnL9FGkSqVmky6pETAV2Wh2dO+VN9B4P3G1bQ/5/dTkPCxxVJc9htmDGfg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f21a:b0:a51:f463:cfa6 with SMTP id gt26-20020a170906f21a00b00a51f463cfa6mr4090688ejb.29.1713654725134; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:11:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyBu7xXVeYJe96fMFC1u=jGT6B49awPqVdN72XaqMy_2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028cea506168f553c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XQstgjdIv3X8J7Z1XgYgZ5LDFMQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:12:08 -0000

Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org> wrote:

I don't go to these anymore, or even register online. You can just watch
them on YouTube and skip the boring parts.

But, if no one went, I would have nothing to watch. So, I agree it's a
problem.

For some measurements on things that I have personally flown:

- SFO to Hyderabad: SFO -> Dubai (16 hours), Dubai -> Hyderabad (4 hours)
- SFO to Singapore direct: 17 hours
- JFK to BKK (they don't have this one anymore): 16-17 hours, and the
flight went around the world, meaning it flew east to BKK and the return
flew east to JFK.

This is probably all slower now, because geopolitical situations can make
it difficult to overfly some countries.

These trips are absolutely brutal, even if you fly in business. For a trip
like that, it's pretty much a 2-week deal, so you can get your mind back
after the jetlag. I think a lot of IETF people actually like planes and
things, so it's not a giant pain. The issue is whether one can make the
entire time productive. If someone from Australia flies to San Francisco,
they can probably book a lot of meetings, even within their own company.
Not so going the other way, so that's the issue. It's just a function of
the density of Internet companies.

thanks,
Rob