Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Thu, 25 May 2006 04:18 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj7If-0004Zr-1S; Thu, 25 May 2006 00:18:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj7Id-0004Zh-Ml for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 00:18:15 -0400
Received: from ns.virtualized.org ([204.152.189.134] helo=mail.virtualized.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj7Ic-0002dk-A0 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 00:18:15 -0400
Received: from terminus.local (ns.virtualized.org [204.152.189.134]) by mail.virtualized.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4P30kdm046986; Wed, 24 May 2006 20:00:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drc@virtualized.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by terminus.local (PGP Universal service); Wed, 24 May 2006 21:18:18 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by terminus.local on Wed, 24 May 2006 21:18:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <664A83A74B8EC25F2B007B2E@p3.JCK.COM>
References: <883F4A921E26D32C08E569F0@p3.JCK.COM> <44745B81.8000508@cisco.com> <7DFCB2920E3DCE504E503EBD@sirius.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <664A83A74B8EC25F2B007B2E@p3.JCK.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <7DD78D86-90BF-4B0A-88A2-3B415B97214C@virtualized.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 21:18:06 -0700
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

On May 24, 2006, at 6:16 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> This is not correct.  They do, indeed, assign values.

Yes.

> They also apply some minimal rules in doing so.

IANA does a basic sanity check and if there is any question as to  
whether a port should be allocated, we pass the request to an IESG  
Designated Expert who says yes or no.

> Squatting on unassigned values, while it does happen, is considered  
> to be in bad taste.

It is often disappointing to folks who have gone to the trouble to  
obtain a port to find out that nothing stops someone else from using  
the same port for a different protocol.

Rgds,
-drc



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf