IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 13 June 2016 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69F612D9CE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqZNY57Jgp0F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486E112D9D7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5DKOOkP019084; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:24:24 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5DKONkr019068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:24:24 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <B937F6B4-248F-42B7-BBDB-C82B914C874C@ietf.org> <eb706622-69e6-2161-29d9-27e43d241030@acm.org> <20160613183608.GA31629@gsp.org> <201606131926.u5DJQoGx059585@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201606131926.u5DJQoGx059585@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Subject: RE: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:24:22 +0100
Message-ID: <028101d1c5b1$92d8a590$b889f0b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHSUDM7ApVYn+fLtqservuXs0QTgQJeRdrzAq9VXjYDE/3tvZ+ltSgg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22390.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.172-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.172-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9zTThWtzImvn29HJkmfLWXg2y0j5vXZGdsM3mpA5g7KXQiTz9aMsS3uI sgsGn4ebeaDX6xRaTsatYxQPBCTfip1VEaBaPUgcSrrFmZ1Ea4aSJMluB8dI7/WAXs8IQX1uau2 5ABrYOW40lEvc5sL1PhAk6tYXWDXx+zoAW8R15l/1RUeLAvHT8spSHbAuVFq+myiLZetSf8nJ4y 0wP1A6ANv+6Yr58phjxx7l0wJgoV3dB/CxWTRRu+rAZ8KTspSzAsUei+Rm/Wj3WPWyJ1tR19pb6 GXktQHz6O3JyyvMucKajnCnHoWi6wfGdyzJxE1sHF8HbrfBFo62oe9mclZ8QwsPuydnc7TpCQKe QDeH+fUPvTV19UCLO5Iv06+1Rxr97r4PjzaceGt+3BndfXUhXQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UG7feSPV3-8--zfMtOFgqUIXLa0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:24:44 -0000

Yeah? This isn't more than a threaded email archive is it?

But...

"The RIPE NCC uses cookies. Some of these cookies may have been set already.
More information about our cookies can be found in our privacy policy. You can
accept our cookies either by clicking here or by continuing to use the site." 

Nice?

Adrian

>  > Moving to web-based collaboration would be a massive downgrade: it's
>  > a truly horrible idea.
> 
> Ripe is experimenting with a system which combines email with a web
> forum: <https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum/>. The first
> reactions are positive. It might be something to consider.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email