IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Mon, 13 June 2016 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3912D986 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snt9AwOjrGp6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C536812D97F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u5DJQoGx059585 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <201606131926.u5DJQoGx059585@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <20160613183608.GA31629@gsp.org>
References: <B937F6B4-248F-42B7-BBDB-C82B914C874C@ietf.org> <eb706622-69e6-2161-29d9-27e43d241030@acm.org> <20160613183608.GA31629@gsp.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> message dated "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:36:08 -0400."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <59583.1465846010.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:50 +0200
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_MUZtrghMx9Th329lSl7WeWnzxg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:27:35 -0000

 > Moving to web-based collaboration would be a massive downgrade: it's
 > a truly horrible idea. 
 > 
 > ---rsk

Ripe is experimenting with a system which combines email with a web
forum: <https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum/>. The first
reactions are positive. It might be something to consider.

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email