IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 28 August 2013 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555AF21F90A7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTcArE4vsFFK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27521F8E7C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.235.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7S0SuhM017062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377649748; bh=4fUPGoRkH3+i19HJbGFju+J+JceDZHkSukHsFFeWeEc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=YxqpQnH5z+B8Pfr1SyU2dOJqdiFX284YfmtNI2F9zPmetEYklJOcoG5DEQ+GW0rNM sSK4tePFz5MlFHfun+nmFU0a1LUn8FL2rqUNJGoBSRnWtJZPy8EpiPE9G1k0DHz8OG /7hZhb4rR4p3P6uFS793Y+NiFRBsE3rl907PNz0A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1377649748; i=@elandsys.com; bh=4fUPGoRkH3+i19HJbGFju+J+JceDZHkSukHsFFeWeEc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gEgYTGClXDWlL6N5qY5YVo52Q0StGrpq5D3qqQkE8/v5sGq7iJeOc5+OjTgPnylMi BooOkbMxq3dAFcWRE2frIjTTAcKE1ukW8sXEu3yCI9ZRKk4logUZ3mKlQ5nhLQIMhg VnkAsBYeiFpm29D+Hweti9I2X46DWNUNXSJVcbTI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130827171456.0d7e1e48@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:28:29 -0700
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhekZdQ2gej-raCD_oGr5ErU577sOwcMxq_eg-6kaF0UA@mail.g mail.com>
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408224060750E@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <CADnDZ891f9z=snhx2mP1oqZK+iPih79LDhHrFHu1gjT4mkMbhw@mail.gmail.com> <38BAB050-5B83-4530-84E8-FBF27E822C7F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|1ad6c5e007d1f092769939d09c0615b9p7QBpW03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|38BAB050-5B83-4530-84E8-FBF27E822C7F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775267379@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAPv4CP8ORvFQXsRV2vZqk46S4+ZkLm+GeV3wxdUvcmZ96yyEVA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775267681@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <20130827190857.GA48013@verdi> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775267BF5@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <521D0F39.4040201@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAMm+LwhekZdQ2gej-raCD_oGr5ErU577sOwcMxq_eg-6kaF0UA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:29:18 -0000

Hi Phillip,
At 15:53 27-08-2013, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>What I found incredibly rude was when an AD and Working Group chair 
>actually hissed when I gave my company name at the mic.

I submitted draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis  During the 
discussions (see thread at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity/current/msg00201.html 
)about the draft it was suggested there should be consequences of not 
following the code of conduct.  What action would you suggest against:

  (i)  the Area Director in a case such as the above?

  (ii) the Working Group chair in a case such as the above?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email