Re: Rude responses

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 27 August 2013 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A51421E80C8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nO1POqXdbap9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x231.google.com (mail-pb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7796D11E816E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id xb4so4616686pbc.22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tPbjf63USo+ICk7Pr308KXYycpRVEu7lIJH9fq1+V+Y=; b=Tx1auVl0VIq/w9thgYDNpHi86YOcrxqP3205fbWVLlAf9Xt/jc0WrGZmW8mup6ZFs7 izBGYy9kjjPWxBb/1WLT6XLL9NQa6xXifrgIasUIZm1p9iVhvoIrr9PW4AnB+/RG1d0B Gae9T4oUd5cDXUtDcjkkk5oOJYLqQCLgVGyr78M0Rh/tRq7WdjqKV4T7vySya1r6ZJCs yHfOuvpmegKnPEJBlTVL4ofMYcgNHRFBTA7NRkQB2iEvcnYMjzXZ0gTKg5YpbZBS5b7b GwG2QrplwEDsB8Pz+pzPM+Ye+lYG2UUmpTlYbhUZah0NEp/qMIWOsxg17WGPD2as3Wxt Gn2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.111.35 with SMTP id if3mr7698079pbb.181.1377597005040; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.195.168 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408224060750E@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408224060750E@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:50:04 +1000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ891f9z=snhx2mP1oqZK+iPih79LDhHrFHu1gjT4mkMbhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rude responses
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b67692821146504e4eaccf8"
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:50:06 -0000

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:36 PM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

> > I experienced rude respondings in IETF list
>
> That would be when you tried to get April 1 RFCs discontinued.
>

No, I experienced rude response from some participants including you, and
regarding yours I received a private email from one director that he ask me
not to reply to you because he wants to handle it with you privately. I
request that the IETF Chair to stop you from sending me any further emails,
because you are changing the subject to personal issues.

AB


>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Abdussalam Baryun [abdussalambaryun@gmail.com]
> Sent: 25 August 2013 12:27
> To: Pete Resnick
> Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call:
> <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for
> Authorizing Use of Domains in Email,         Version 1) to Proposed
> Standard)
>
> I experienced rude respondings in IETF list and in  one WG list, I don't
> beleive that it is culture of IETF participants, but it seems that some
> people should understand to be polite and reasonable in such organisation
> business. Finally, the rude responding is not controled by the chair of
> thoes lists, therefore, thoes lists can be rude lists from time to time.
>
> AB
>
>
>
>