IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process

Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Thu, 29 September 2005 06:52 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKsH1-0007kb-H9; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:52:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKsGz-0007il-D5 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:52:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA22318 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKsOa-0000CT-6t for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:59:57 -0400
Received: from [10.10.1.59] (wlan-gw.denic.de [81.91.160.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8T6qWbZ014557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:52:37 -0700
Message-ID: <433B8F02.6090602@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:51:46 +0200
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20050926163811.524EC3BFCEA@berkshire.machshav.com> <4339367F.5060108@bbiw.net> <433961F9.60503@zurich.ibm.com> <20050928125539.GA5560@sbrim-wxp01>
In-Reply-To: <20050928125539.GA5560@sbrim-wxp01>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Subject: Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


>> 2. An IETF "netiquette" committee, to offload list banning procedures
>> from the IESG.
> 
> I don't think so.  I prefer that this responsibility stay with a few
> individuals, so that it is taken very seriously -- not only by them
> but by everyone.  A committee would lead to dilution of responsibility
> as well as endless discussion on every dispute.

Good point.

As much as I believe the IETF should not give veto authority to any single 
individual, this is one case where it is probably better.

My sense is that, without exception, IETF participants involved in deciding 
process objections has taken their role extremely seriously.  It's difficult 
to believe that this would be any different.  In addition, any abuse by the 
ombudsperson will be very quickly reported and corrected.

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email