Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Sat, 24 March 2012 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210F421F8688; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myxTIldQ6qJD; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4892A21F869F; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-40ae.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.64.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34C820244; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D9B314767; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
References: <20120322152611.20184.76979.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:42:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120322152611.20184.76979.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> (The IESG's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:26:11 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslr4wizbq2.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:42:37 -0000
Hi. In the writeup I asked Stephen to include a note that there is a normative downreference to RFC 4757. RFC 4757 is informational. This document recommends that implementations not implement some of the algorithms in RFC 4757, thus creating a normative down-ref. My opinion and that of the WG is that permitting this normative down-reference is the appropriate course of action.
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die… Joel jaeggli
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-d… Sam Hartman