IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: a note about the scenarios

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Fri, 24 September 2004 23:15 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA00792; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAzP9-0007Oz-JI; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:23:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAzEq-00067J-8X; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:12:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAzA1-0005Bl-KM for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:07:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA00147 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAzH5-0007GJ-So for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:14:49 -0400
Received: from [128.9.168.55] (upn.isi.edu [128.9.168.55]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i8ON5DJ25815; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4154A7B2.4090204@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:03:14 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <0KNHTWZygPYF.G9ymhZVg@mail.mobiili.net> <20040924155420.GF18868@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040924155420.GF18868@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-ISI-4-30-3-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Subject: Re: a note about the scenarios
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0411754900=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da


Tim Chown wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:03:41AM +0300, John Loughney wrote:
> 
>>   I've skimmed the recent documents and have come away feeling rather
>>   uninterested  in  the  topic.  As  with most others, I asume, I'm more
>>   interested
>>   in technical work not aministrative or reorg work.
> 
> 
> I suspect this is why Harald is now requesting more input - the "masses"
> feel either uninterested, too busy, or not knowledgeable enough to make
> a decision (something the consultant should not suffer from).

Or overwhelmed by the length of the documents that describe these issues 
in detail.

If you're looking for a way to get people to ignore an idea, make it too 
long to bother to read. ;-)

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email