Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 15 April 2020 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375D93A08BD; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ub5_ZRpiI_KK; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE513A08BE; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id g2so533379plo.3; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MpNzGWS1H4mfq90GIPQuyloZWQvJI+dYT64iNru1K7g=; b=lhwOi2jkE11FV1sJqRw1qKQYV9E/mgoAJngq/EMGD2H+TseB5u9Zpm/zwzqDQI7Ngv 7fPB3xV7E9dB6AAp5tpxTbVOjwJE2726jQkxaVXQzCFAIuVrUaIf1vCUj8ptGN5roYZ6 4a7L89uOW9fD4XdIW1My61fDzk5wacTG9UEJwu1ADZiORiHMxMQ4NIPRTaIqO6GiZUYf HG3+LmmAHF+6P0YtnEGTKqrQS4cZ6RbfO1Awlr0cxdsp2CIEiChB6lF9tGnpljCuSRCJ 8DuL3q0A9qPgDkHAc0nnpcP40oS7D2DxBQtbu8az/HfkYATSxUR7IKyvZbPf2oYOiI3X jv8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MpNzGWS1H4mfq90GIPQuyloZWQvJI+dYT64iNru1K7g=; b=TudKJWQCfmK1zi1Xoa7zAcsjkJ8gZpP4h3lETSdnEdnUv9Ai/JhXxniFtCFJqS2RX4 uIeli2xnqkaJtQTVy5iPtcVMYJrPxXBShJzEmLHZk4q8pv3kwwe/so2sFHNgRkgumJ4E pW84/YUpac90I/MOLYSfDggcjc8xnrCK0FAv4jF2x67zJAjJAQR/DyOXCLeziw6qNvo1 F1n/el5rFRORe5R+BXaeA/VSKuZeDIfLwj+dAxGDMt9pY/K3llyFaFbHIaTUaVC6Efue m7To9KQinnrlmNEB+8D8g6MabjPlE9Fu9UWx1EdiubqAj/UN9bg5Q5cKouqXVSkLoA3e O5qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubbO/kLTfLACvJr1Aro0xSp38LGB0Ae4tCsi3r/2frG8BAJusnv UpErtXFdwbAH2jCyd8N5d3oghO62
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJB4dYCjv8snxlpl1Lg+fSwcJeOe9u9a7l4bN2H3NJSUEGYgZBxnXmAFwzkBqhv2u+UL/RSyw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5d02:: with SMTP id s2mr1355745pji.148.1586986889487; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm15191662pfe.9.2020.04.15.14.41.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <158577408473.30741.7367230227368617933@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200415075448.GA18660@nic.fr> <0396F105-7E41-4249-A2A3-8FE76855088F@vigilsec.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2c907716-91f4-f1bb-1492-3550aac6b678@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:41:24 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0396F105-7E41-4249-A2A3-8FE76855088F@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_xJ68ct9hx39PD9dRHQ2y2X5FMo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:41:32 -0000
> > >> On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:54 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:48:04PM -0700, >> The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote >> a message of 37 lines which said: >> >>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the >>> following document: - 'Registries for Web Authentication (WebAuthn)' >>> <draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-05.txt> as Informational RFC >> .... >>> IESG discussion can be tracked via >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hodges-webauthn-registries/ballot/ >> >> The ballot was not created at this time and still isn't, so the above >> URL yields a 404. > > The document is in IETF Last Call. The ballot is not issued until the document enters IESG Evaluation. So that shouldn't be 404, it should default to an informative page. Or, it could redirect to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hodges-webauthn-registries/history/ as long as there is no /ballot page. Brian
- Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Russ Housley
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Brian E Carpenter