Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 15 April 2020 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90793A0831 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWnj5eTy8ucv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C533A0835 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA59300B59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:31:24 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9EfHaHxPuL1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47052300AB0; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200415075448.GA18660@nic.fr>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:31:24 -0400
Cc: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0396F105-7E41-4249-A2A3-8FE76855088F@vigilsec.com>
References: <158577408473.30741.7367230227368617933@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200415075448.GA18660@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/b2RP63NFinH_NpkosMQL662IM5A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:31:30 -0000


> On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:54 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:48:04PM -0700,
> The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote 
> a message of 37 lines which said:
> 
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
>> following document: - 'Registries for Web Authentication (WebAuthn)'
>>  <draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-05.txt> as Informational RFC
> ....
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hodges-webauthn-registries/ballot/
> 
> The ballot was not created at this time and still isn't, so the above
> URL yields a 404.

The document is in IETF Last Call.  The ballot is not issued until the document enters IESG Evaluation.

Russ