Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 15 April 2020 07:55 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDB63A110B; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T09yyrQUsc8s; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B073A1106; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CE99280605; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4703A2806C8; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F76C280605; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD3964C6C03; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 296EB3FDA1; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:54:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:54:48 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Ballot URL when there is no ballot?
Message-ID: <20200415075448.GA18660@nic.fr>
References: <158577408473.30741.7367230227368617933@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <158577408473.30741.7367230227368617933@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kxIYatQfIuyYa4-2xwy2mDnlsy4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:55:18 -0000
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:48:04PM -0700, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Registries for Web Authentication (WebAuthn)' > <draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-05.txt> as Informational RFC ... > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hodges-webauthn-registries/ballot/ The ballot was not created at this time and still isn't, so the above URL yields a 404. Is it a good idea to post URL which do not work (even if they will in the future)?
- Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Russ Housley
- Re: Ballot URL when there is no ballot? Brian E Carpenter