Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 04 March 2008 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF09428C630; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:34:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.866
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.866 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.779, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDk32IrY89R7; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AF528C5C3; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:33:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE0928C61A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:33:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJfDWATv3Gir for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D481128C5AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:32:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E681C00D8; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:32:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE261C0097; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:32:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5198258ECCE; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:32:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:32:16 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Mark Crispin <mrc@Washington.EDU>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20080304103216.GA4077@nic.fr>
References: <1366777170.29281204132370162.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com> <alpine.OSX.1.00.0802270935460.11461@pangtzu.panda.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.1.00.0802270935460.11461@pangtzu.panda.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: IMAP Extensions WG <ietf-imapext@imc.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:26:44AM -0800,
 Mark Crispin <mrc@Washington.EDU> wrote 
 a message of 162 lines which said:

> The actual correct collation, assuming(!) surname-first collation and 
> Latin character ordering(!!), is:
...
> due to where the surname is located in various cultures.

Is it a good idea to sort on the ordering of the sender's culture? If
the ordering is to be useful for the human user, it should be
according the receiver's culture, no?

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf