Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 23:46 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3673A69FB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z92icT+2TOfS for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D453A68E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so1821701iwn.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JpZev6stJHvpBG+WJsWYP6JMbtSU0eXNJ9EHcZeuH0U=; b=NuUxUwOmnjpj3KKnw+RJ3neDO+uCDHzKtD5RrFsQwUfk8Bexg85TOiL2+gbi9qUW1M qaUrxU2Kaj+1vtzK5spDIbPojFo6VqnrrshENga2HJ8g438xAr2U7jnDkP4GMHl3Pa8l 9peOXjmG/wQNs7omIqwQUcSselMzWFi+t8qTU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=J+XqafDjfUTYdqocAR3zuRhnx9uKViSbq75NtGOB5KPAUSna+an+KqzgvCxbQh/hek 0aklQXQ4R9h5ZivXyNSBNlFX0mQt4OMtT065NsSLLMx9XzY1BccYeYeYam0pURvL21q5 a9QS9fM+9QHzCyGVhpbvucyIdQGtabUG+4ORQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.173.3 with SMTP id n3mr1947088ibz.56.1284075989727; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.35.70 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C8922E0.5020009@bennett.com>
References: <4C8922E0.5020009@bennett.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:46:29 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDtO10Dp-_9yrK=hOS_yD-UjipNL7bjOHngCKT@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Richard Bennett <richard@bennett.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:55:48 -0700
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:46:03 -0000
There are two possibilities here: 1) The Press Release is accurate in its representation of the IETF No action is required 2) Someone on the Internet is wrong No action is required.
- Latest Development in DiffServ Wars Richard Bennett
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars Bob Hinden
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars Richard Bennett
- Re: Latest Development in DiffServ Wars Phillip Hallam-Baker