RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09.txt> (Current Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts) to Informational RFC
SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 26 April 2011 18:03 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559EBE0785 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJQHYYfOP68b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D942BE075F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id p3QI3Jh3006003; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1303841009; bh=xgGSsME3ymYwAEipfwi6i1IfRSfvmI6xItGQcm1Chhw=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=xam99/CuLbMW8YbvZU3MlhFMbkW2ft0wrOVyrrWdO72JQaeR2q7fo6SUT58O959Ej fbu65KA2JcuIs4QyL+XI+3KF+AQyYTYM+zns+/hADS5BPHu02vFiVMBofo3Rlhib2+ 5QP+Zwhh8xBgG+e9TecHhCkcn+cYnHE70EGTDDrE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1303841009; bh=xgGSsME3ymYwAEipfwi6i1IfRSfvmI6xItGQcm1Chhw=; h=Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=ol32Bf7w2BBr3SKB11PFdE+JBZwkFtZyidNvGCOVZFgnSYSAQ6OrnDOP0viR7NQ0M 74pv/cvUGa5DvkDynSvqAwPCmz7xEBlBTRWL/SIWNgBZ7SOMgOPXUPjI5JctiOnLWB Pi2GOJQGPuk3emy9RZZ8NKzK/Edn9sv/vwudV5A4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110426093245.0385a570@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:49:21 -0700
To: pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09.txt> (Current Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46201A8EAFB@ftrdmel0.rd.franc etelecom.fr>
References: <20110328163814.1159.77824.idtracker@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20110425064026.03e7b6c8@resistor.net> <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46201A8EAFB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: mrw@painless-security.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:03:34 -0000
Hi Pierrick, At 02:55 26-04-2011, pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: >I see your point, but the section describes the behaviour of a >particular OS and "primary" or "secondary" is the terminology used by this OS. Thanks for the explanation. I see the same terminology being used in draft-montenegro-mif-multihoming-00. Regards, -sm