Re: [IAB] IAB@iab.org mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 12 February 2016 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4336E1B3F02 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUtB4YZ8Vumu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F291B3F00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c10so40951519pfc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jiSf+lp5Z09GEg6ua8s4CR9FGANGAkpjmubOFw6UKrs=; b=KUNJW33uwrBAfVVYcqps5LjU8o8CdlfMBzwWpTklKxcXoH4MCBdhkSYR5zr3XhMtVo De9hRQz8hwu+y7I2iXDHfyEBFWgyDqnhCnLUEOUNz9FlgkW0+WmMIWjjT3304b/AYYpo eZK2SN9Y8hZpizmyDe2QjcRVxQEDl3EM3hmpoYXiUNt7Z6h51IjUkpdPsq4prv4YntY9 pp11aWJAbITfBqTiYgmfGF/opPiJrAUxvsnmEVL+73Q8D94C7Zt7DrMrqBKA9hdvvUx5 wCXGwB+J3UYfY/LEKjM0awP0ybVORkzMbDTPKZeTK5whPunBTL/Ltat9GrGBRCRztbqI hnDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jiSf+lp5Z09GEg6ua8s4CR9FGANGAkpjmubOFw6UKrs=; b=MureHu8ewH5dUeynRaBByWauh/x5eef4fn3lsotuzuSxgkp7khJWzBYfyYASz5Z75s g4QQQx2GvdV+jAofAQ4J7XNG1xmOZ1PB9LFrqA4Qm32n0RK56A5tfOPLQa4m/V7lFJ+M 7trNDtg7xmw04qFhduQ2QZSZcpldVfZvrZUbN2b4p6mfkRpS+4znZ4JWeoEz/cocPTxA Q6YqTeooYQzSopjqNYai0gYlWhZ9MV44QI0YpndZHLInPbQRw9Dq+XY/1+75nDb8Gh8b dQaYnrvCoA16TRmPFhK8EjGU6YZoZDv5A/Dn4c7byXFo3iWjU7MYBETCyexoLAJinraK 8AbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ+4lZAZOCgYNIc/3WuxEUXyc3VMdiVtyFsPM9fv2nl/VnXcoYC1uQVmTFMYA1Gaw==
X-Received: by 10.98.72.135 with SMTP id q7mr70685680pfi.151.1455248591378; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:5496:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:5496:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id tn5sm14333055pac.32.2016.02.11.19.43.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [IAB] IAB@iab.org mailing list closed, yet asks for comments?
To: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.0.1455225768.17992.iab@iab.org> <56BD06D3.7020404@gmail.com> <939D575A-9550-45D2-BA55-B960DB0F0031@amsl.com> <56BD45AF.5060209@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56BD54D5.1040601@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:43:17 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56BD45AF.5060209@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/j7WowqHB7Qj_aqsxack0L3aCEA4>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 03:43:13 -0000

Doug,

http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

That's where these drafts have been discussed extensively. Note that
it's *not* an IETF list, because RFCs are for a wider community than
the IETF.

    Brian

On 12/02/2016 15:38, Doug Royer wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your response, however the question remains. Why ask for
> comments (implying discussion), to a closed list? I can not see my posts
> and I can not see any replies. It seems odd to me.
> 
> Is there a better OPEN list where these IAB drafts that are being posted
> to the IETF be discussed?
> 
> Generally are not ALL IETF drafts being called for comment supposed to
> be discussed on OPEN lists?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On 02/11/2016 03:31 PM, Cindy Morgan wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Your message to the IAB list was initially put into moderation, but it was sent to the IAB list.  In this case, there was about a 20 minute delay between you sending the message, and me releasing it from moderation.
>>
>> The practice on the IAB list is that messages from people who haven't sent to that list before are moderated at first (to reduce spam), but are then added to the whitelist when the message is released from moderation.
>>
>> Your request to subscribe to the IAB list was rejected, because the membership of that list is restricted to the IAB. I apologize if the rejection message from Mailman made that more confusing than it needed to be.
>>
>> That said, anyone can send messages to the IAB list (though their initial message to the list will have to wait for moderation).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Cindy
>>
>>
>