Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 31 March 2015 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC311AC411 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aavFWIPwEauu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBBB1AC3F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 046EB283015; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:48:23 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Message-ID: <20150331154823.GY17637@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <55163324.6030504@openca.org> <20150328211906.GI17637@mournblade.imrryr.org> <89D53DE5-4C92-45EB-9C9C-599D9841EB2D@ieca.com> <20150330192905.GS10960@localhost> <5519A8E3.3000605@cs.tcd.ie> <CAMm+LwhBV6FU_qAxDckZwSyBGVGd0T=hFj==w_7e2Mi+xm5hQA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhBV6FU_qAxDckZwSyBGVGd0T=hFj==w_7e2Mi+xm5hQA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jSDh0qXEhRROLlLVzf2ik8dtvPk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:48:26 -0000

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:12:19AM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> We might be making the situation worse however by insisting that IANA
> issue OIDs to organizations rather than for projects. This is one of
> the few instances where IANA is acting as a non-IETF registry on
> behalf of the (now defunct) ITU-T.

I'm actually using an organizational EKU OID that is not for a "project".
The organizational arc is just fine.

-- 
	Viktor.