Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
Alex Jordan <alex@strugee.net> Fri, 03 March 2017 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <alex@strugee.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A39E129598 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:23:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.882
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.882 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khOA1_dLv6Oy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from steevie.strugee.net (strugee.net [216.160.72.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6741126579 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [207.251.103.46]) by steevie.strugee.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4546572E977 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:23:21 -0500
From: Alex Jordan <alex@strugee.net>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard?
Message-ID: <20170303212321.GB52509@Alexs-MacBook-Pro>
References: <20170302055128.GJ12470@Alexs-MacBook-Pro> <CA+9kkMBdheNCiAAq2xHs5v5UBFErBYhRZ5ksWFq4089ve+NK7g@mail.gmail.com> <20170303212035.GA52509@Alexs-MacBook-Pro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170303212035.GA52509@Alexs-MacBook-Pro>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kGZFUC_R4hVI6os7CJWjxG0_g0A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 21:23:26 -0000
*sigh* CC'ing the list, which I forgot to do... On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:20:35PM -0500, Alex Jordan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:33:52AM -0800, Ted Hardie wrote: > > > The applications area uses a working group called DISPATCH to answer the > > question "where should this work go?", so you might start by writing up the > > idea as an Internet draft and submitting to DISPATCH. The Security area > > uses the saag list for similar discussion, if you think it is more of a > > security topic than a usage of web push. > > Thanks, that's very helpful. I'll take discussion there when I have an > Internet-Draft ready.
- Interest in a push-based two-factor auth standard? Alex Jordan
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth stan… Ted Hardie
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth stan… Alex Jordan
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth stan… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth stan… Alex Jordan
- Re: Interest in a push-based two-factor auth stan… Phillip Hallam-Baker