RE: Pink Squares
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 22:08 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3431A89C5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.101
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_EQ_STATICB=1.372, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uk7zryipDd-h for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa3.jck.com (static-65-175-133-137.cpe.metrocast.net [65.175.133.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACCC1A802D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hp5.int.jck.com ([198.252.137.153] helo=JcK-HP5.jck.com) by bsa3.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1ZIl8Z-0003Kt-Pm; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:08:15 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:08:06 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Pink Squares
Message-ID: <6D27907483BDCD7C02A2EA9F@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0301MB0655B6A80AAD9BBAEE389BAEA8810@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <099001d0c5fa$b8ab14e0$2a013ea0$@olddog.co.uk> <55B2148F.5090202@gmail.com> <C1A18380-D4B1-4D6E-9C77-2235CB76FE3A@gmail.com> <B25C7D63-0004-4CED-8686-19B85DF4CF9C@sobco.com> <94AE4DBBCAC4C9EC5AF00DEC@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <DM2PR0301MB0655B6A80AAD9BBAEE389BAEA8810@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mlODTJ1gsgKA0NgKx_3hcK7IRgQ>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:08:20 -0000
--On Friday, July 24, 2015 7:30 PM +0000 Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> wrote: > John, we are in 2015. Computer vision can definitely help > tracking the speaker. You can find face tracking algorithms in > many packages, including open source variants. Computer > systems can easily track the speaker's face, crop the image > around that, and send the speaker-focused image over the > video. This is not rocket science. The pink box is obsolete. Christian. In my limited and very backward experience, face tracking systems are really good at keeping track of the movements of one speaker, even a moving one. When there are multiple people in the front of the room, with multiple microphones, etc., plus a microphone line or three in the middle of the room, maybe not so good. That is, however, neither here nor there. My main point was that we need to get more serious about making sure remote participants can participate and tell what is going on and that means resources. whether those resources are more people monitoring or working the systems or more intelligent cameras and software is a decision I'm happy to leave to those who are more expert than I am (which doesn't take much). However, I remain convinced that more resources and commitment are needed, whether that is mostly weighted toward individual commitments (standing in boxes, giving names clearly), additional staffing to aim and select cameras, or higher- technology equipment. best, john
- Pink Squares Adrian Farrel
- Re: Pink Squares Lou Berger
- Re: Pink Squares Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Pink Squares Alexa Morris
- Re: Pink Squares Paul Wouters
- Re: Pink Squares Bob Hinden
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- RE: Pink Squares Christian Huitema
- Re: Pink Squares David Conrad
- Re: Pink Squares Carsten Bormann
- RE: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Bob Hinden
- Re: Pink Squares Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Pink Squares Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Pink Squares Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Stephen Farrell
- Re: Pink Squares Ted Lemon
- Re: Pink Squares John Scudder
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Pink Squares Melinda Shore
- Re: Pink Squares Tony Hansen
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Pink Squares Simon Pietro Romano
- Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Dave Crocker
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Dave Crocker
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Stephen Farrell
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) John Leslie
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Stephen Farrell
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Ted Lemon
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Ted Lemon
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Stewart Bryant
- Re: Pink Squares Stewart Bryant
- Re: Pink Squares Tony Hansen
- Re: Pink Squares Tony Hansen
- Re: Pink Squares Stewart Bryant
- Re: Pink Squares John C Klensin
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Yoav Nir
- Re: Pink Squares Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) John C Klensin
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Ted Lemon
- Re: Pink Squares Alessandro Amirante
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) stephen.farrell
- RE: Pink Squares Andrew Allen
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Melinda Shore
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Warren Kumari
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Toerless Eckert
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) John C Klensin
- Re: Pink Squares Alessandro Amirante
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Michael Richardson
- Re: Single virtual queue (was Re: Pink Squares) Yoav Nir