IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Pink Squares

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sat, 25 July 2015 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9DC1B2B01 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0c5rC3nTavIM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AF01B2B00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so54684066wib.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=habspxvQMNpvCWdh1IzjDq32cv+zgVHxjSIr7GjogRM=; b=A59RBRddV7NV6DCfiSNiSvtJrZkdNAiEYNS9EjDgxGJnA81kTDSQwDRDy3njuSnep9 nRQeJG7if+lOmJhm4gd84Q3rOpebbSHVKfXcI2onk9p3s1fwfZxArdiU4RjjflpQyYfe lZfvm5Zhkg0LbM520X1jjgj0VSp2BZ+cB1w4PieejWlDqzW46j387u7PaeTsMxkHwT9T DYU9wqZXELuTn+bLIZf/Clq2wdHGYXfxUYJLsGT0j6cpNKuSsqxkyaJe3IERyLWC4aGt FuLB2LJ4IfooLGYCFExly7DpPIHE8xL3PB+T0c7/6i21uIeyN+3ghdv9ZKbOSLLOcaNK GwBg==
X-Received: by 10.180.36.3 with SMTP id m3mr3328467wij.60.1437800236393; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.50] ([62.168.35.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hn2sm15771403wjc.45.2015.07.24.21.57.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Pink Squares
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AA9E5986-9FD6-4496-926A-0FACACBA30EB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B25C7D63-0004-4CED-8686-19B85DF4CF9C@sobco.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:57:12 +0200
Message-Id: <026CEDB6-071A-4F04-801A-88B433E2208D@gmail.com>
References: <099001d0c5fa$b8ab14e0$2a013ea0$@olddog.co.uk> <55B2148F.5090202@gmail.com> <C1A18380-D4B1-4D6E-9C77-2235CB76FE3A@gmail.com> <B25C7D63-0004-4CED-8686-19B85DF4CF9C@sobco.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xQE6bKFiYB0dbIZZtGbEeCmohbs>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 04:57:19 -0000

Scott,

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Scott O. Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote:
> 
> and a always-paying-attention operator (for each room)  to know when to switch - potentially adding significantly
> to the cost

No doubt, but I we may gone too far by eliminating a camera operator in the room. We pay for it in quality.  I suggest spending a few hours watching a recording session and see what you think.

> 
> fwiw - standing in a place where you can be seen by the camera so that the remote experience is better
> without having to dedicate a camera operator to each room seems a very very small price to pay

I agree.

Bob

> 
> Scott
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 24/07/2015 22:23, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> A proposal...
>>>> Could Meetecho please just zoom out.
>>>> 
>>>> Alternative proposal...
>>>> Make the pink box a guide for speakers who want to be in frame, but stop telling
>>>> us that we MUST stand in the box.
>>> 
>>> Also, we *really* need a repeater screen so that the person speaking can see
>>> the slides without eyes in the back of his/her head. Speaking coherently about
>>> a slide that I cannot see is beyond my powers.
>> 
>> While we are talking about making remote participation better.
>> 
>> I watched a recorded working group session last night.  Currently the video is only of the slides and a small view of the speaker.  Unfortunately, when someone comes to the microphone, you don’t get to see them speak.  It would be much better if one could see them when they talk.  This might require panning the main camera, or a second camera (and I guess a second “pink square”).
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email