Re: Complaint to ADs regarding censorship of dissent

Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> Mon, 24 November 2025 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D93E8F88A8A for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 06:59:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=aiven.io
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vUXXfzPPz-5a for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 06:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76688F88A7E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 06:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b735e278fa1so269835266b.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 06:59:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aiven.io; s=google; t=1763996390; x=1764601190; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=v5p/23u+leeJ24sOc/4/HcJGesLwlzxP3kNB7dENcRM=; b=Y2fUzCqKEP9tFerme9mHsrfTNPvh1vfwi+O5RH7k8oTUapO8eFlZCagQBNsb55DNW+ yb8syszkJQIElq0tt7nnC+EN3dDNinrHGMsqoxz+7ID3GWhYVmK3kvjSyYHi0sY3tqR1 cPsVYisLgfAkPriu78iss9DHl+zwnmZbq6dEc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763996390; x=1764601190; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=v5p/23u+leeJ24sOc/4/HcJGesLwlzxP3kNB7dENcRM=; b=hWYRUSd4cKg2/21BNb2jCakTylImr43nJgk5pR8nhXs8bolAxIXzp7CXUDGTjkCftY WBTI/8MZYUFyolvpQdH4I5l2gCXG/q+oI00Rybu+xq0uglnPDSJ3L8QDTQcUMx0LZTyz 2y8RMXLMDjQkXLITPLkZIdzXWPA/+W1CpWJ89UKMcf2KL+tSY80wW2Ylna+RmTB6Ecwf 4nexoidH3KsEzzmivt9KzmBWnZDeg7HiGkhls3BKuHaMyUMMMJg4SSJqjw3P4IBjvb+2 9JL3S8Nkp/fOf5TEx0sCLk32fv2bMjnCGT4/kSdiqdtuoGrQrtVfwROYR+5iFbac7lUi FNTA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVaqrscSxQGs1cjS3vE34gx4A4G9cQ/wdIvPTVYThFvS81ALG7t9IA+W2Jk62mZTHlWhds8@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyiCJVpN0CXtn80x3Jb8plrGlaByT+GSNqsHydnM3YRPP1RCISJ oHL2SwGp1veoVC04V5IxVvCdB05DXz39bjgwOFYezHWq32gv7PK5hagoDosRjIB3XjTWBfeyrJ+ DCyoN2jOXU3HLh+eRlxNGafVOWFRCZQ6F+NxQAkbjrA==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctYr/SfFHcmKwJ2dbyRwu7smDA0uLOer1npr/GjNPlIRl1R8d0AvpRUTU2iM75 YDI8RaTuANxMtfOTjCsXu40WAzUF18nRVgPWQNH/Z1sb0b1OU0P4R4ZWjERxTbjRFT81FNwnsHU o9YXtV5emcAZ919hdy/rrSvFbLAXWwdi9I0vYMeARNF1UgcjB8a9g/wV2GyYSG+RyF1VRKJZ4f0 qsu9/9PGbCxFbqUq15XRYZuQ3Ypuk2ameRmcHuAyYRokD6ZbrUVIpaBnwZbrrUr5W0Igq/vKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFcFWOuBTm2ShRTw0nW8sv/7XK7TjeKu4HdLm3h3bD8Xve9l9oRGsxUdYiDSVU76BQW+9//w8qa8wozlpYjVFM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3cd3:b0:b73:4aa5:35e5 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b7671520d11mr1327830666b.7.1763996389458; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 06:59:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20251124112214.209792.qmail@cr.yp.to>
In-Reply-To: <20251124112214.209792.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:59:37 -0500
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bm06d0LxD0vtK8ec9nrhR6hONp1mb6wlkn2NF1_SHPSSWYCnv_jxYQaK9I
Message-ID: <CAGL5yWYMA21z1csvFU-KiwoQ5E0EORbAhhJkVtvdrxjUvay2sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Complaint to ADs regarding censorship of dissent
To: sec-ads@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ddd590644586a5b"
Message-ID-Hash: G5XQULTDJXWO5NZ76PWFS7JX5X2RQLOP
X-Message-ID-Hash: G5XQULTDJXWO5NZ76PWFS7JX5X2RQLOP
X-MailFrom: paul.wouters@aiven.io
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nAvIYXppy24OXXFyBoXoPUUP568>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 6:22 AM D. J. Bernstein <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:

[ message not quoted as it contains as a derivative clause  ]

Dan,

The TLS WG Chairs had cleared your moderation flag at the 30 day mark on
Nov 17 as per RFC 3934.
Your recent message to the tls list was not "censored" (nor moderated).

What happened is that your message was held by mailman for "posting by a
non-list member". This means that the email
address you attempted to use is not subscribed to ANY ietf mailing list,
including the tls@ietf.org list. The ietf mailman
daemon sent you a message stating this. Based on your long email, you did
not read that message our system sent you,
or your AI auto-responder opt-out handler prevented you from seeing the
message.

It will take a few days due to the Thanksgiving period to figure out the
exact details of what happened, but I assume this
is similar to past messages where you seem to use ephemeral email addresses
to subscribe to different IETF lists, thus not
getting the advantage of the IETF global accept list that allows posting to
all lists even if you are only subscribed to one list.
Somehow, your ephemeral address used for the tls list got unsubscribed -
possibly because it no longer exists on your end,
or because it generated excessive bounces, or perhaps because of a mail
loop with your AI auto responder. I hope to find out
more next week. I have instructed the TLS WG Chairs not to approve the
pending email, so that we do not disturb the current
state for that mail connectivity investigation.

If you wish to post in the meanwhile, you can do what everyone else who
uses the IETF mailing lists does, and properly subscribe
your email address to any list and then post, without using intermediate
ephemeral addresses. You should also disable your
QRsecretary auto-responder if you want to receive informative mailer-daemon
/ mailman messages from the IETF lists.

With the continued use of your derivative clause - your issues might spread
to more mailing lists for you as you get moderated
there too. Again, all of this can simply be avoided by ceasing to use the
misleading and incorrect derivative clause in your emails,
as indicated in the IESG Statement:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-derivative-works-rights/


Paul Wouters
Security Area Director for TLS