Re: BoF's in the Age of Covids

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B313A0997 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tMTnMMRkE7q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B08B3A08B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id ms17so9542337pjb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=T+578Xib6dLqx33r6zuuCDNz0XTiTN/TDZAKY9Djw28=; b=xOlEPvKg51CHaQYwwB3jBSqARTB3at/AYJkQIGybkgZBLK3SfbfOFaQ+fAiFnmaYe3 PK/OQQf7i6pvZpi3/FOu/ee5KF2NdXZ3G7HoHBna7He8b7DRy9Z5DaAm0/Ihj3UBwyMf nQGXxVdW0XDvvJN1A/dXGhJKm8kk2EWOVqzSAduA3Pmj9+MIE4mU40CW5eJkdL0WOJ5+ KQ+jXYXKSfksEAkvVUa/AhFGWA5I0A7iW8e1mz4bunYGs5JR+nRW/NEVtsq6PzX8tPDC tRe5eCWEigPC6NbplXdmMgcnHzPBLsaONbsApyuPwZCEkWXsD0M/gxUYYqQ/3oyED6lD M78w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=T+578Xib6dLqx33r6zuuCDNz0XTiTN/TDZAKY9Djw28=; b=eiwftUV+JrZG/1Si8LtklNVV29KrOgmVjJ1+xzNah7aJy/HUQTcELA7QSRkIIPA6zr j+LXf/xiKsE9bXhKlX3LAMtXgoK+89kwhv1/Vd2AuYKR53uEBp7rXMwHh2GIfImRuW+U UFqn6aWjbvmzELL5sf37DJPiuPAGVPT3+OhtcVZc9kmmQDqWLI5C6VP7LfI92oDvoc4e dP4B58ImuSxGlYpSMckwWGuQDCXTPzQXFj6XGrRR+iRd20+m0dhgCUvTYh3SdPPfGjOe 8OrblbScB4vwK+wwByZ//22W36RNG0NjUrsQNihrFK/lNp+hfAAPdU8haV64mjgFoHAK QRmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZMzwUCkrsKm2gERGEs26vTeowikDTjpq68LqeS/qzL6t9KIE80 S28ZzTri8I95vJsaW+kH/TjdMbPk+QQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbNS5naSOeFff04PuurAAHb4FeEMjyX+tRljhYwK8tbTneg9wzZJOww7SjzJYaGd59mThY1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5289:: with SMTP id w9mr27772457pjh.97.1589296374181; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MichaelsMacBook.lan ([170.75.129.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm13188112pju.1.2020.05.12.08.12.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: BoF's in the Age of Covids
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <4db0288e-4910-670a-7897-fffe68d06982@mtcc.com> <19600.1589238846@localhost> <bd298cdc-1d29-2ae0-7ba7-f8a58220285c@mtcc.com> <7464.1589271343@localhost>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <9a33c639-e85c-1d2e-bd24-50b392d1c07b@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 08:12:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7464.1589271343@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p_Ttx2uLHfZWuLhiyJb9X6wbHKo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:12:57 -0000

On 5/12/20 1:15 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>      > On 5/11/20 4:14 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>      >> Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote: > It's been my impression that a
>      >> substantial amount of the work for > putting together BoF's, etc has
>      >> been done loosely and informally > usually in the setting of a meeting
>      >> and drinking beers with others (aka > bar BoF). Since we seem to be
>      >> doing neither neither these days, from > what I can tell this list is
>      >> the closest to that in purpose. Yet since > it's ietf-wide it includes
>      >> lots of different areas and interests it's > easy to see how the
>      >> signal to noise ratio might get bad in a
>      >>
>      >> I agree that ietf@ietf.org is a good starting point, but I think one
>      >> needs to take a bit of a shotgun to a half-dozen other MLs to let
>      >> people know you are thinking of something.  ietf@ietf.org is not
>      >> universally read, alas.  Also making use of Any-of-Other-Business
>      >> section of other virtual interims to talk briefly about things.  I
>      >> wouldn't be afraid of babbling about such things in the jabber, DURING
>      >> (virtual) meetings, but also in hallway@
>
>      > You mean wg ml's? Often that is the *last* place I'd want to bring
>      > something new up and from my experience the feeling is mutual :)
>
> I'm not suggesting trying to have the conversation there, but rather, that
> it's an important place to find interested parties.  To be clear: it's for
> the announcement.


Yeah, that smells suspiciously of spam to my taste. You're trying to get 
the attention of the usual suspects, but the problem has little if 
anything to do with the wg's. The bulletin board in the lobby is a much 
more neutral place since it is passively rather than actively alerting. 
Maybe a per-area bar-bof-alert mailing list? nicer would be to be able 
to send out the idea and create a chat room for it which was reaped if 
it goes unused for some period of time.

The long and short of this is that for an org so bolted at the hip to 
e-conversations, it's going to be interesting to find all of the places 
that we're dependent to meat-space.

Mike