IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 July 2016 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B51F12D84F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RtUUydjEL0Y6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B39C12D887 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2BA200A5; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:15:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEE5638D1; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
In-Reply-To: <578E14F4.2040000@gmail.com>
References: <578E14F4.2040000@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:06:00 -0400
Message-ID: <20731.1469030760@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sXhQPTygyZxvtYWz8O88Cl6ZziY>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:06:10 -0000

I have read the document.
I strongly support the idea and of running the experiment.

I am concerned that one year may not be enough time to socialize this and get
useful feedback.

I propose that there be an option to renew for an additional year.
It can clearly also be used for Internet-Drafts (as some of us have done to
your draft...) ... I would like to suggest that the datatracker page include
a link to the stream page in section 5.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email