IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 29 February 2020 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ED13A0C83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:18:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nb2Cn0qCyiFd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20BAF3A0C81 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id l12so5940972oil.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:18:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yEDYoel6DCO/mX2/gHCU26uk3s0m/226txO2gO53XOA=; b=VGvE7RDtprc+KPaNLQ20yFcuvouw7hehFctDmqhdlhNOF0LP14bhOlximgMh7fYqOq viJWNswfJEwC4evtPsSnNnJiu8iVPTxGBq9/KZvxXNVGuoHdzu99ocfllCj0n/lVcJrJ 9xfWrN0imP8ALYnxJ6KnyB+my1SIwfWETEL//5CtDpZzxTWxwqXeap30HKdZdxPPnpgu ED7zJQB1N4NtKMlV7nMqUm3Y0mTOOF90Z4owAgNCtLd3MigbcQllm0igpddGPTgJF74Z NBh0beBoPM5T27petrC5uPO81u+kjVxhhtDWFeM94o/bFD/sAytXmlCc5bZ+KDNpeFXJ VWWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yEDYoel6DCO/mX2/gHCU26uk3s0m/226txO2gO53XOA=; b=Y6RigbQwgRYYXauVpFZ5XP+MJCiKf3wJNc9G0oG1qe6b2Y6WB8Viwx4ILDSoJGoxa6 ehkCgz0HRyJ72eXjLyTB/kxtL8eK4eeSjv8ppTYBmvlYvIQc09BHmescDhEF1j26iM8f mFzrqfg2M4QOWDxV7GQyPiHP1xZqICCGg7k6uCOlnYZpt63p3ynE6wNpPGPzqOQ13Od3 160X5HzP/IGdJPpAIOYFJGw66QRUc2ZXO+HhYCsxcWX0ZAX5L4jV27euPEZi/MW+rLZ4 z/kXz4yDNVr3HXSrowwp5X9ikQc0EEiLCDGsjIA9eTeh8XxqGJG246RdqI35LIueCDtD 6yDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhalrLUbTDYC1ItLx9m9p40ZTBaqANs7ijEQAsRHm6/wLmB6co OQeJF7szYT0w1zYHXn1mEEPiisno/tvZxD77e8PafYd3/00=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIyP4uJ1+ejxofTbegOqBM1lpEa5TGGS1yv4VUtKpteoR3Z3tCJgaIDilm39TGuPas2SIDJJZLs9roKMwZFjM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4306:: with SMTP id q6mr6620200oia.54.1582989482177; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:18:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <17421_1575566127_5DE93B2F_17421_93_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5518_1582908787_5E594573_5518_436_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD1BCA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <C8417F71-D61E-42AC-831E-B85269D5D4A5@steffann.nl> <9b677b7c-fe52-dbae-7f83-2b5be5194325@gont.com.ar> <6.2.5.6.2.20200228132634.1060a610@elandnews.com> <CAOj+MMHYXydkzOc5WrkoGdfUmFq+zuNsxGy+qqkAHYNUFK0KuA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200229052740.0bf7fc08@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200229052740.0bf7fc08@elandnews.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 16:17:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGaHnVV9iVEsmatQyOeP_61qXw4yGYN+NdeK5C570V29g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4cd86059fb875ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tAQDC3ND0e8BskZFMCWlC327SHc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:18:06 -0000

>   There isn't any IESG decision for the errata processing phases.

Interesting.

When I click on any RFC number in the below errata link there is always
"IESG writeups" section  containing the formal IESG approval. In addition
to that in the recent erratas there is also "IESG evaluation report":

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=Errata&activedrafts=on&rfcs=on


Maybe just errata containing spelling errors could be approved by an AD
alone, but to fundamentally change the meaning of the specification IMHO it
would be pretty bad for IETF process to allow such shortcut.

Many thx,
R.


On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:52 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Dear Mr Raszuk,
> At 02:36 PM 28-02-2020, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> >His information about 6man AD not accepting the Errata: 5933 is
> >correct. Errata must be first accepted by an AD then processed
> >further. Since it was posted on 11th Dec 2019 it was still not
> >accepted at first stage. You are mixing AD acceptance / validation
> >with IESG decision. Those are completely different errata processing
> phases.
>
> Once an erratum is reported [1], a report is automatically sent to
> the Working Group Chair(s), the author(s) and the Area
> Directors.  The relevant Area Director ensures that there is adequate
> review and the erratum is classified.  There isn't any IESG decision
> for the errata processing phases.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
> 1. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5646
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email