IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733BE3A1705 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:23:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BnKWOpt1-V5Q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769663A1707 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.81.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 0233N9TH029647 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:23:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1583205802; x=1583292202; i=@elandsys.com; bh=nVhpf8eGj7ZfXNNYUo9hrrPemHneO88oQnHDd7eJ4v4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=YB9fn+s2ZFA8mvi9UQ7RAq55WrOS+jbarFAfo5wcd899afekzoeXm3xz8vwR/tn08 v9qsGM4eHGFrkZEdyXVrFAP272+FI3a0sGi1xrHbwedQiLJa1MVCuvqs/1EPogryqN dL1oJQ3vEWWBgBUwfvhyeuGE66Iasec6yOt/psLU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200302184206.1002d350@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:09:35 -0800
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
In-Reply-To: <789E2B90-CB59-4CEC-B6E9-F1E47D8F0B95@cisco.com>
References: <17421_1575566127_5DE93B2F_17421_93_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5518_1582908787_5E594573_5518_436_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD1BCA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <C8417F71-D61E-42AC-831E-B85269D5D4A5@steffann.nl> <9b677b7c-fe52-dbae-7f83-2b5be5194325@gont.com.ar> <6.2.5.6.2.20200228132634.1060a610@elandnews.com> <9449c98e-b1d6-2c74-b78d-df3f5ba15ebc@nokia.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200229223634.093850f0@elandnews.com> <DBBPR03MB54150500DA829FBAB73DFEC1EEE60@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200301111046.0c0499b0@elandnews.com> <CAOj+MMH3eyjoQe=SokYQ89HM2po01G1V=kgO+653EKx8eaobzw@mail.gmail.com> <789E2B90-CB59-4CEC-B6E9-F1E47D8F0B95@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NZhj7QHAQ_t-vvSi7jgoNg6bmmI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 03:23:38 -0000

Dear Zafar,
At 10:01 PM 01-03-2020, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
>Furthermore, since IETF106, Spring WG has only one active chair, as 
>stated by Martin in the above email.
>
>A copy of Martin's email is cut-and-pasted for quicker reference:

There is an email at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/c_pEmX92LmgokljYGlXxiZwarHU/ 
The information about the working group roles is confusing.  On one 
hand, it has been mentioned that "only one active chair" and on the 
other hand there are three persons listed as "must be present" (two 
Working Group Chairs).

Please see the content at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/N5j4CZAbTtjtzffvi7DbjVVfU3M/ 
There is an IESG item about: "work on some mechanism to obtain wider 
or private feedback from people who are disenfranchised; anonymous 
flagging of offensive emails to inform leadership; more opportunities 
for private feedback".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email