Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sat, 29 February 2020 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CC63A086A for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:15:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Hc300ILH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=vCkIwCQ3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GZEY6K00mfPw for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FEC3A0869 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:14:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12263; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582938899; x=1584148499; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6g339BI8U3q2zQ4LScmPFKwTgdzfZM0gt41hNCZYjMs=; b=Hc300ILH2qtLHmjZROhxDn3cF9USyuT4v4ZyQueALpBmuaScOGEqytbO 5slL72tF8vG4XGj2SVkODU+zYBWl2pCaig1QQD8FpIdgeQFO0jVEqpN0L MMOP3jeHfzI4HD+iEjewq6DIy8WUK8KvYgyzT1/2uC4L1tgte+FhKdvI9 M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AdyrpaRWN2PaEyWJZ7egZAzy15QbV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSA9yJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtankxBMVNUlZ59lmwMFNeH4D1YFiB6nA=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C2BQAFulle/4oNJK1gBhwBAQEBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?BAREBBAQBAYF7gVQpJwVsWCAECyoKhAqDRgOKZ4I6JZMzhGKBQoEQA1QJAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BDAEBGAEMCAIEAQGDCnFFAheBcyQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFZAI?= =?us-ascii?q?BAwEBEBEdAQEsBgUBDwIBBgI/AwICAiULFBECBA4FIoMEAYF9TQMuAQ6SbpB?= =?us-ascii?q?nAoE5iGJ1gTKCfwEBBYEvAYNdGIIMAwaBOIlcgkkagUE/gREnDBSCTT6CZAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgGBKCoPLoJkMoIsjWyCeYVwmUoKgjyHUY8UHIJJjGyLfIRHkyWPGoMyAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?CBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBU7KgGCDQEBMj4SGA2NeSQMF4EEAQiCQ4UUhUF0gSm?= =?us-ascii?q?MCC2BBAGBDwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,498,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="736185818"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Feb 2020 01:14:58 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01T1Ewl8015101 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:14:58 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:14:57 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:14:56 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:14:56 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Hj0vdmg01z8QpUb5bUiYXsIt3j10U96TyZjHRsLZ3d9VtA4gD+GmxgGXHbXNtkvWPoikbUmyqH+TXehXkBo4AyjSo6gRF4Z5NbRrs4dOe8XGZpwLFZYEoCIYb7xyVMMfZJDx3dQhwOcB6zaHZrZwjjwjAkDPGHddyekynfownlMa/qzWU+ZzZE4TgbqW/H4JAfLX3dpvKEzZ2mGdA0GwCNOrPLJfGkHs2Qjp5+pQWjA3GPbk5vLOXwHXTeShvWck0OZY6d7R1PxksaepLk/VmgsV5jdBhW5SuzcMWZHJXzXn4bMP8Oe6PcObqsFeTzfCRy+ywnJy5pXqfUD46w2OmA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6g339BI8U3q2zQ4LScmPFKwTgdzfZM0gt41hNCZYjMs=; b=b4kNilMlcOBSXuz4vfhnXKq8xORBKi27v/8U86rTCeP/aagHuq87pYB+i7TTPKofKVrNvSBF2yb4RV1x+4im6YxJxzL0opeFQX7gwkPdTNrPbBhbowUTaT94dWWECLIpzxWCXvuKkEW8YTucYcMhtJWPLd3MLwNsabZ8nZlbM5pCZ6CjtbQjwvuaZVt6+Nr/o6kaqfRlgC0UKAuhwJzJJGzUK7GWOklVJALRyBEwrRKnXXSqXW6qM7RaHNZkzZtvlN9nAcsbxat5ZeBCXXWqJk6CwbksKcRcRQ0im6Irs/vU/qZ+RyQ+CzXUC68LzJxQOD9Mi+0zmnXwbrLe4EUKng==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6g339BI8U3q2zQ4LScmPFKwTgdzfZM0gt41hNCZYjMs=; b=vCkIwCQ3nGkkDPeY/Hdu442DorZiGrcpOYeIPgYJSBYsv1+L1SywlXyeb0zDxnyWJQLRXNvu+q3Ip5ms77L2IgsLXWG9NRNIxAHVFKiyAMpl+odS+1PihZHb2ZBKp33ENlWXo6fN38KrAxhsD+UalCgYl2k3d1eH+h/KlafXdRI=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4415.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:192::31) by MN2PR11MB4013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:13e::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.22; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:14:54 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4415.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::393e:c7fe:1d69:fa4e]) by MN2PR11MB4415.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::393e:c7fe:1d69:fa4e%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.018; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:14:54 +0000
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, "Martin Vigoureux" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Thread-Index: AdWrjZKMyJw/FcG0Qj29O28HuDn7+xCyRBPgAAZxpoAAAMT+gAAD0ygAAAEyhIAABYR7AA==
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:14:54 +0000
Message-ID: <F74EB307-DC09-4589-9FC8-D0C0E118696A@cisco.com>
References: <17421_1575566127_5DE93B2F_17421_93_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5518_1582908787_5E594573_5518_436_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD1BCA@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <C8417F71-D61E-42AC-831E-B85269D5D4A5@steffann.nl> <9b677b7c-fe52-dbae-7f83-2b5be5194325@gont.com.ar> <6.2.5.6.2.20200228132634.1060a610@elandnews.com> <CAOj+MMHYXydkzOc5WrkoGdfUmFq+zuNsxGy+qqkAHYNUFK0KuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHYXydkzOc5WrkoGdfUmFq+zuNsxGy+qqkAHYNUFK0KuA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=cpignata@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [108.203.7.63]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 838a7cd8-2f97-4fec-160a-08d7bcb4c90e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4013:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4013B024747C10B06E382EECC7E90@MN2PR11MB4013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 03283976A6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(66446008)(64756008)(66946007)(66556008)(33656002)(66476007)(2616005)(76116006)(54906003)(86362001)(6916009)(316002)(478600001)(966005)(26005)(91956017)(186003)(4326008)(8676002)(36756003)(81166006)(53546011)(81156014)(8936002)(6512007)(6486002)(71200400001)(5660300002)(6506007)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4013; H:MN2PR11MB4415.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 6+I9i0MNM2VV0azTy/hlqkgbTllVm20qhUYWg6q2APVq0RjX1aMHNZh5QHG57A+shv/I0ngKWqPGFtgT2QJF7R0gYSY14anzdWCUUXU2ViyYcLFnUj/gyxyZuAFMSb3/D+TNQ5Qhy1A1IADYVq8/+A==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F74EB307DC0945899FC8D0C0E118696Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 838a7cd8-2f97-4fec-160a-08d7bcb4c90e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Feb 2020 01:14:54.7154 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SUUJww3VHvvRs6aZlk+0pwe4Gu/YRgfRUnzunGVa7v/FxpKELkPHzFEjc0+7qa1ygHVvPI4ue/FMm2iEafDmow==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4013
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/N5j4CZAbTtjtzffvi7DbjVVfU3M>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:15:03 -0000

Robert,

I did not read any “accusation” or “attack” in SM’s note, nor anything specifically directed at Bruno, the person, his decision-making, or his character — just a set of question to the AD on potential based on roles and processes.

Thanks,

— Carlos.
PS: There are documents that codify some cases (like RFC 4858, IESG statement on shepherds, RFC 2418, etc.)


2020/02/28 午後5:36、Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>>のメール:

Dear Mr Moonesamy,

Let me state that your accusations of Bruno's conflict of interest are simply absurd.

You can count on one hand such chairs like Bruno who not only know very well technology in the WG they are chairing, but also take a very neutral position in accepting or progressing any work by the WG. I know Bruno for over 20 years and never would even think for a second to send such nonsense blast.

Last time I checked IETF does not prohibit chairs to be part of WG documents.

His information about 6man AD not accepting the Errata: 5933 is correct. Errata must be first accepted by an AD then processed further. Since it was posted on 11th Dec 2019 it was still not accepted at first stage. You are mixing AD acceptance / validation with IESG decision. Those are completely different errata processing phases.

I understand when someone is not able to make any further technical arguments, personal attacks start. Awesome !

Have a nice weekend,
RR.


On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:04 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com<mailto:sm%2Bietf@elandsys.com>> wrote:
Dear Mr Vigoureux,

I am contacting you as you are listed as the Responsible Area
Director for the SPRING Working Group [1].  I would like to thank the
Working Group for providing some information [2] about the status of
the Working Group Last Call.

I was a bit surprised to see that one of the Working Group Chairs is
listed as a contributor in
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10.  It is quite unusual
to have the contributor of a Working Group document handle the
Working Group process for the document.  Would there be a potential
conflict of interest?

The summary provides by the Working Group Chair states that the
Responsible Area Director "has not accepted the related errata".  I
took a quick look at erratum eid5933; it is listed as "Reported".  As
the erratum has not been classified as per the relevant IESG
Statement, describing it as "not accepted" is inaccurate.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/about/
2. https://mailarchive.ietf..org/arch/msg/spring/or8086G4iYfee5_Icw4PnhkPLBo/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/or8086G4iYfee5_Icw4PnhkPLBo/>
3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5933

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring