Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Robert Raszuk <> Sun, 01 March 2020 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2523A0E7B for <>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:52:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDnzsiqf3EDh for <>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3976C3A0E79 for <>; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id j16so7058886otl.1 for <>; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 04:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qClOZxIc8LF3MJCmJaTDfh8INT9oF4SmUOkzpdMMlQ8=; b=B9vFfCgFbELyZOPok3xlKuChKfrXaXDkrK6FfCm91kQdnJ1Dc2jI8GTG4IkL0JmqIl XBDLoB4Ve3xoiRCZNG1jL1ow09GCTTX8N/qJ1udMNyN8T9W72zcHmnb2xOZN38F1fDA2 KClJpgbIQf8s6or7ifgeX5fmj0221igLZSlY0M1MW+io4biCYHZmqozVHtVc74KRhK3P a+m7prHgI4aEkhzqdSf4Gp2WBRdwmJTxk/pxMnaWS7BzM3Q1PeWDRoK2L7/9WwITTMtJ lMshoI6Njdtrpik+PWb6z2nja6yaKwITfnl8jqnEpO+Wjc6u+lA8E+zEcRwhUH/DOY1D Ymhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qClOZxIc8LF3MJCmJaTDfh8INT9oF4SmUOkzpdMMlQ8=; b=QgzHlZZKAQrm17mwT/vh8cRhXoOYCO5AZhO/Fh0zGvA+mF2bvJq7DbA1nAa6LyiaX0 o0TDe38a8Nm1Dffx1VNPkafLQjsk4q7pBVg3RaaGeCR50uRXvPO67fMOpxmzYu8vdeTy OJFbYLyAoiC9fsZgB8/ziKQVHbH2IKMT25/Q771Vilyveos2ZAIqKzx0gClst/+M92Ye ShkqCOCB2U2CAmNc1PR89+XlAXhIq+LPvAeTobhtmyUdAz/9Df4MxalKED1/2KDXUE5T vBrn0ut9KF9gMeINpdnXvl40WoTFJw9wTnh7PCO5b0v8xFUYEkxl714FRUl01YX5hbG+ YRZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1HiDpEC8IOTElG3Lnmitdhix2ckb4lOLLx+wFRKrfxjlK2/wr3 YTfEMLldzWgbLyLEqdZUQHm5Op5JBzLPlwUA1OkAjQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuCluKAlO+JTea5fsLriqAhgDumGE5XJuBR5smt?= =?utf-8?q?a7rVxjXfT5yF/ASQsskBjn7gQ0PEPw07O5reQhuC9In9JY8=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:64d4:: with SMTP id n20mr1484208otl.193.1583067121292; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 04:52:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: =?utf-8?q?=3C17421=5F1575566127=5F5DE93B2F=5F17421=5F93=5F1=5F53?= =?utf-8?q?C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporate?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E_=3C5518=5F1582908787=5F5E594573=5F?= =?utf-8?q?5518=5F436=5F1=5F53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD1BCA=40OPEXC?= =?utf-8?q?AUBM43=2Ecorporate=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E?= <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Robert Raszuk <>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 13:51:52 +0100
Message-ID: <>
To: Fernando Gont <>
Cc: Martin Vigoureux <>, S Moonesamy <>, SPRING WG <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006bab02059fca894f"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 12:52:04 -0000

> a situation in which a person is in a position to derive personal

Just so we are clear here ... what are those personal benefits ?

Does anyone think that by writing IETF drafts and progressing them anyone
here gets paid or perhaps get's some sort of recognition or maybe a medal ?

If so great for you - but based on my own experience in IETF involvement
this was/is never the case. A lot of people just work in IETF based on
their personal beliefs and do commit personal free time for such work. That
is so true especially for non vendor participants. And that is a fact for
Bruno too.

Now go fire all chairs who co-authored or contributed a draft in their
respective WG as clearly they may have influence on the process itself
either directly or indirectly (via other chair or AD).

Kind regards,