Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

[Martin Vigoureux <[e-mail]>]

Dear Mr Moonesamy,

I am convinced there is no conflict of interest.
Since he has been WG Chair Bruno has demonstrated exemplary behaviour, 
on top of being a recognized expert in his field.

Regarding the errata, "not processed" would have been more accurate than 
"not accepted" but I am sure this is what Bruno meant.

Best regards,
Martin Vigoureux

Le 2020-02-28 à 23:02, S Moonesamy a écrit :
> Dear Mr Vigoureux,
> 
> I am contacting you as you are listed as the Responsible Area Director 
> for the SPRING Working Group [1].  I would like to thank the Working 
> Group for providing some information [2] about the status of the Working 
> Group Last Call.
> 
> I was a bit surprised to see that one of the Working Group Chairs is 
> listed as a contributor in 
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10.  It is quite unusual to 
> have the contributor of a Working Group document handle the Working 
> Group process for the document.  Would there be a potential conflict of 
> interest?
> 
> The summary provides by the Working Group Chair states that the 
> Responsible Area Director "has not accepted the related errata".  I took 
> a quick look at erratum eid5933; it is listed as "Reported".  As the 
> erratum has not been classified as per the relevant IESG Statement, 
> describing it as "not accepted" is inaccurate.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> 1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/about/
> 2. 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/or8086G4iYfee5_Icw4PnhkPLBo/
> 3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5933
> 
>