IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 03 March 2020 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BA83A258A; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:41:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uqr1k_v-AR_w; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252E13A258E; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A022249; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:41:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:date:subject :subject:mime-version:from:from:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1583260878; bh=mY7Yyf/r0+agkITDRbLs9utwYTzzIyw6T6RPTMTK9z0=; b=F twWLTM/mV2Ls64cgNCzWZpJSJQRKlm/ADLS+kSdzmKAxOB/SNuVqG53nJM75XpY2 V/L2uahRO1G4MNqN0nyiCNfKSS62X3pjWIzUez/aqsIl1wHvRRB8SxWHFChxGrnD dT2PxirV39ONN5yhBR4E3GFDcmOTsaHj7z1vX57S4A=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5GX_vHc_6fzU; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:41:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:dc24:9112:b647:1132] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:dc24:9112:b647:1132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 777AF3C; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:41:18 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 19:41:17 +0100
Message-Id: <C257E8CE-B82E-450C-9AEC-779BEA494E86@steffann.nl>
References: <13027_1583251625_5E5E80A9_13027_228_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD81CF@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <13027_1583251625_5E5E80A9_13027_228_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD81CF@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/prkwjwZdrKvWnFEA6bHXX8lyGc8>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:41:30 -0000

Hi Bruno,

> Good.
> How do you propose that we get an evaluation and formal answer from the IESG on this point?
> My proposal is to ask while asking the IESG review on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.

I think it's important that the answer can be used to improve the draft, so whatever works for that. That should be done before we can discuss consensus. 

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email