Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Mon, 02 March 2020 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ED73A1092; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:13:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ydqToof5KDh; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA943A108C; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F3E49; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:12:27 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1583179945; bh=vXUuJDUpri8UNcmdy+e pcyAjxIeKw1aLpKjD9+sPH9U=; b=lqS2bCp/qc/v4EtE6IN1/JQqJvYJgfJsKD6 K8btgak5N83DzRyuQGmFzael5nsrCKZ+SsLoaHAKEHJXuMcjqe54S8bYK/DGYs9e PEv3I+ivCZ7gMQm2fis/cpUBwUhX0DiTxzZrPNtCQ9JcmvqAC03QpX5uy0eussu4 0KV/RyQk=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id m79CbDuho2ok; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:2022:41af:c4f2:3aef] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:2022:41af:c4f2:3aef]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27C413C; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:12:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <A2903302-5616-475C-BEA7-9F9B32328E5E@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3836EFD-A191-485E-AE6E-55936498882A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:12:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3e2da3a5-5d1b-10a0-aeb4-320c57584241@nokia.com>
Cc: spring@ietf.org, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
References: =?utf-8?q?=3C17421=5F1575566127=5F5DE93B2F=5F17421=5F93=5F1=5F53?= =?utf-8?q?C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporate?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E?= <3e2da3a5-5d1b-10a0-aeb4-320c57584241@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/8e6_lbaUhz87wNcLFB7oNy6lNgc>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:13:08 -0000

Hi,

> My overall conclusion is that there is support and rough consensus to move this document to the next stage.

Declare consensus immediately after a new version is published and people haven't even had the change to read it?

NO, just NO

Sander